2021
DOI: 10.1016/s1473-3099(21)00132-8
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance and operational feasibility of antigen and antibody rapid diagnostic tests for COVID-19 in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients in Cameroon: a clinical, prospective, diagnostic accuracy study

Abstract: Background Real-time PCR is recommended to detect SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, PCR availability is restricted in most countries. Rapid diagnostic tests are considered acceptable alternatives, but data are lacking on their performance. We assessed the performance of four antibody-based rapid diagnostic tests and one antigen-based rapid diagnostic test for detecting SARS-CoV-2 infection in the community in Cameroon. MethodsIn this clinical, prospective, diagnostic accuracy study, we enrolled individuals aged a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
77
1
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
7
77
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A retrospective study conducted by Yuri et al highlights the diagnostic value of immunoassay-based detection of serum N antigen in combination with its respective antibodies (22). Boum et al (27) evaluated an algorithm that combined antigen rapid diagnostic test screening with antibody rapid diagnostic test screening for antigen negative, followed by PCR confirmation of IgM positive samples. However, this case identification strategy had only 34% with a slightly higher sensitivity than PCR alone, but with a specificity of 92.0% and a lower positive predictive value.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A retrospective study conducted by Yuri et al highlights the diagnostic value of immunoassay-based detection of serum N antigen in combination with its respective antibodies (22). Boum et al (27) evaluated an algorithm that combined antigen rapid diagnostic test screening with antibody rapid diagnostic test screening for antigen negative, followed by PCR confirmation of IgM positive samples. However, this case identification strategy had only 34% with a slightly higher sensitivity than PCR alone, but with a specificity of 92.0% and a lower positive predictive value.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This supports the use of DBS in large-scale SARS-CoV-2 serosurveillance studies as a valuable alternative to venipuncture, especially in the elderly, where venous blood can be challenging to obtain. In comparison to serological rapid tests, which can also be implemented in large-scale SARS-CoV-2 sero-epidemiological studies, DBS offer higher sensitivity, specificity and the possibility to (semi-)quantitatively asses the antibody response (15). Moreover, DBS have the advantage to collect and store the sample for multiple analyses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While LFA testing is inexpensive and quick, its effect in reducing transmission may be comparable to a 14-day quarantine, when used as daily serial testing accompanied by isolation of positive individuals Q9 (Quilty et al, 2021). LFA testing is a critical component in the response against COVID-19 pandemic especially in resource-limited settings (Boum et al, 2021).…”
Section: Dynamic Of the Epidemicmentioning
confidence: 99%