2016
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)ey.1943-7897.0000270
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance and Emission Characteristics of a Diesel Engine Using Cerium Oxide Nanoparticle Blended Biodiesel Emulsion Fuel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The neat LGO had lower cylinder pressure compared with all other fuels, due to its higher viscosity, density and poor volatility, which led to poor atomization and evaporation of fuel, whereas the LGO emulsion produced higher cylinder pressure compared with neat LGO and LGO nano emulsion because of the water content in the fuel leading to longer ignition delay and its induced more amount of fuel to get accumulated in the engine cylinder and it was suddenly burned [23]. The LGO nano emulsion fuel had lower cylinder pressure compared with LGO emulsion fuel due to the advancement of premixed combustion zone [38]. The HRR of LGO nano emulsion fuel had lowered compared with diesel and LGO emulsion fuel.…”
Section: Combustion Behaviormentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The neat LGO had lower cylinder pressure compared with all other fuels, due to its higher viscosity, density and poor volatility, which led to poor atomization and evaporation of fuel, whereas the LGO emulsion produced higher cylinder pressure compared with neat LGO and LGO nano emulsion because of the water content in the fuel leading to longer ignition delay and its induced more amount of fuel to get accumulated in the engine cylinder and it was suddenly burned [23]. The LGO nano emulsion fuel had lower cylinder pressure compared with LGO emulsion fuel due to the advancement of premixed combustion zone [38]. The HRR of LGO nano emulsion fuel had lowered compared with diesel and LGO emulsion fuel.…”
Section: Combustion Behaviormentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Addition of aluminum oxide nanoparticles has significant improvement in heat release rate and brake thermal efficiency with a marginal increase in NO X emissions. Anbarasu and Karthikeyan (2016) performed an experimental study on biodiesel and diesel with the addition of cerium oxide nanoparticle in direct injection constant speed compression ignition engine. Cerium oxide (CeO 2 ) nanoparticle at 100 ppm and 200 ppm is added to methyl esters to view the effects on performance and emission characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It shows TBC engine emission level as very low when it is run by neat palm biodiesel and cerium oxide nanoparticles mixed palm biodiesel used conditions compared with base engine (Anbarasu et al, 2015). Unburned hydrocarbon emissions were reduced compared with a base engine on an average of 14, 21.4 and 26 ppm in neat palm biodiesel, 30 ppm and 60 ppm cerium oxide mixed palm biodiesel used TBC engine respectively (Anbarasu and Karthikeyan, 2016). This reduced hydrocarbon emission happened due to TBC engine maintaining a high heat energy in the chamber, it absorbed deposits of oil in the combustion chamber wall, usage of one of thermal barrier coated material of alumina and cerium oxide nanoparticles promotes the oxidation process with hydrocarbon (Pandian et al, 2017).…”
Section: Hydrocarbon Emissionmentioning
confidence: 90%