2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.01.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance and degradation of La0.8Sr0.2Ga0.85Mg0.15O3−δ electrolyte-supported cells in single-chamber configuration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10 For this purpose, both decreasing the electrolyte thickness to reduce ohmic resistance losses and using based electrolytes on gadolinium doped ceria (GDC), samarium doped ceria (SDC), or strontium and magnesium doped LaGaO 3 perovskite (LSGM), which present high ionic conductivity at intermediate temperatures, are good approaches. [11][12][13] In contrast, the manufacturing of mT-SOFCs is the main disadvantage in comparison to the planar design, as it is more difficult to fabricate a tight electrolyte layer deposited on a porous substrate in the tubular geometry. For this reason, processing methods are one of the most important topics in microtubular SOFC research, which present several difficulties, such as a relatively high investment in equipment and a long time for the adjustment of processing parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 For this purpose, both decreasing the electrolyte thickness to reduce ohmic resistance losses and using based electrolytes on gadolinium doped ceria (GDC), samarium doped ceria (SDC), or strontium and magnesium doped LaGaO 3 perovskite (LSGM), which present high ionic conductivity at intermediate temperatures, are good approaches. [11][12][13] In contrast, the manufacturing of mT-SOFCs is the main disadvantage in comparison to the planar design, as it is more difficult to fabricate a tight electrolyte layer deposited on a porous substrate in the tubular geometry. For this reason, processing methods are one of the most important topics in microtubular SOFC research, which present several difficulties, such as a relatively high investment in equipment and a long time for the adjustment of processing parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…40 FeO 2.8 , in stainless-steel media, produces an amorphous and highly reactive ceramic precursor which allows the synthesis to be achieved at 50-100ºC lower temperatures than those needed through classical solid-state methods. The stability of the perovskite phase is increased by the presence of Sr. Ceramics with high relative density (up to 98%) are M A N U S C R I P T A C C E P T E D ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 9 obtained at low sintering temperatures (1000-1050ºC) thanks to the high reactivity of the precursors and the eventual aid of a liquid phase.…”
Section: Mechanosynthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the high diffusivity of the grain boundaries results in high conductivities and low activation energies that make possible to reduce the working temperature of these devices [40][41][42][43][44][45][46]. Thus, this original approach constitutes a good alternative for processing materials as electrolytes in SOFC applications which can successfully operate at intermediate temperatures (600 ºC-800 ºC).…”
Section: Proton Conductivity In Oxides (Based On Work From the Solidmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, new strategies for the synthesis of robust hollow fibers as microtubular supports have been reported (17,18,19).Many studies of mT-SOFCs perovskite (LSGM). (29,30,31,32,33) In anode-supported mT-SOFCs, volumetric power density depends remarkably on the inverse of cell diameter, (34) and the area power density is also strongly affected by the wall thickness and the porosity of tubular support. (6,35,36) These devices should also require a good strength for handling during their manufacturing of the single-cell and assembling the fuel-cell stack.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%