1973
DOI: 10.1007/bf00917635
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance and activity of hyperactive and normal boys as a function of distraction and reward

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0
1

Year Published

1979
1979
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Among ADHD sub-types, differences were obtained at picture completion (attention deficit<hyperactivity) and coding (attention deficit<hyperactivity) sub-test scores. Differentiating ADHD sub-types by coding and picture completion sub-tests is consistent with the literature (42)(43)(44). Coding sub-test which is a working memory task requiring matching visual stimuli with certain numbers and doing this process in a mixed pattern and in a certain amount of time assesses perseverance level, power to adjust changing conditions, visual-motor coordination, fine motor coordination and speed (45).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Among ADHD sub-types, differences were obtained at picture completion (attention deficit<hyperactivity) and coding (attention deficit<hyperactivity) sub-test scores. Differentiating ADHD sub-types by coding and picture completion sub-tests is consistent with the literature (42)(43)(44). Coding sub-test which is a working memory task requiring matching visual stimuli with certain numbers and doing this process in a mixed pattern and in a certain amount of time assesses perseverance level, power to adjust changing conditions, visual-motor coordination, fine motor coordination and speed (45).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Similarly, verbal praise alone did not appear to produce improvements at least for on-task behavior (Abramowitz & O'Leary, 1991). However, children with hyperactivity outperformed their classmates on an attentional coding task when a primary reinforcer (candy) was used in the presence of distractions (colorful pictures, paper streamers, toys, comic books, balls, a mirror, a Bobo clown, a punching bag, audio recording of participants playing) (Worland, North-Jones & Stern, 1973). To sustain attention on this simple boring task, the children appeared to need a 'high dose' of concurrent antecedent stimulation as well as an anticipated candy consequence.…”
Section: General Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The altered effect of reinforcement contingencies on the behavior of children with ADHD compared to normal children has been demonstrated in several studies. While reinforcing every correct response greatly improves (e.g., McInerney & Kerns, 2003) or normalizes the performance of children with ADHD (e.g., Freibergs & Douglas, 1969, referred in Douglas, 1985; Douglas & Parry, 1994; Konrad, Gauggel, Manz, & Scholl, 2000; Parry & Douglas, 1983; Worland, North‐Jones, & Stern, 1973), partial reinforcement abnormally affects the behavior of children with ADHD (Freibergs & Douglas 1969 and Parry 1973, referred in Douglas, 1985; Parry & Douglas, 1983). In several choice‐delay tasks, children with ADHD tended to choose a small reinforcer obtained at once rather than a larger reinforcer obtained after a delay (Rapport, Tucker, DuPaul, Merlo, & Stoner, 1986; Schweitzer & Sulzer‐Azaroff, 1995; Sonuga‐Barke, Taylor, Sembi, & Smith, 1992).…”
Section: Experimental Investigation Of Reinforcement Mechanisms In Adhdmentioning
confidence: 99%