2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.dsp.2012.11.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance analysis on Lv distribution and its applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
59
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are two differences between the two methods in [21] and in [22][23][24][25][26]. The first one is that the KT is not utilized in [22][23][24][25][26], and the other one is that the choice of the scaling factors is improved in [26], thus better performance is obtained under low SNR conditions. Compared with the RFT method, the ACCF method [22,23] can achieve similar performance with much lower computational cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…There are two differences between the two methods in [21] and in [22][23][24][25][26]. The first one is that the KT is not utilized in [22][23][24][25][26], and the other one is that the choice of the scaling factors is improved in [26], thus better performance is obtained under low SNR conditions. Compared with the RFT method, the ACCF method [22,23] can achieve similar performance with much lower computational cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The loss can be figured out to be small, which has little influences on estimation performance. According to equation (25), conjugate multiplication causes decrease in SNR, consequent to which the performance of the proposed method also suffers. However, since noise bandwidth of the stretched signal is reduced to be much smaller than that of the UR signal, the SNR of the stretched signal is higher than that of the UR signal.…”
Section: Performance Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, the brute-force searching will require a complicated radar system and a high computational cost [OðMN log 2 NÞ], where M is the searching time and is always much larger than the number of echoes N in the high-resolution ISAR imaging application due to the high carrier frequency and the large frequency bandwidth. 11,27,28 In order to overcome the problems of the aforementioned algorithms, [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] the modified Wigner-Ville distribution and the Lv's distribution are proposed in Refs. 11 and 27, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%