2015 13th International Symposium on Modeling and Optimization in Mobile, Ad Hoc, and Wireless Networks (WiOpt) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/wiopt.2015.7151057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance analysis of wireless devices for a campus-wide IoT network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wireless technologies are in existence in various forms and modes. Selecting the most important technology that leads to high performance is one of the most important issues [4]. Experiments are conducted for selecting best versions of the wireless standards and compute the impact of the same considering the performance of those technologies under many varied environment such as straight road, open ground, moderately and densely wooded area, inside concrete building and the top of high raised buildings.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wireless technologies are in existence in various forms and modes. Selecting the most important technology that leads to high performance is one of the most important issues [4]. Experiments are conducted for selecting best versions of the wireless standards and compute the impact of the same considering the performance of those technologies under many varied environment such as straight road, open ground, moderately and densely wooded area, inside concrete building and the top of high raised buildings.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a lack of understanding of how such technologies behave under real conditions [9], their limitations are unclear, and for most studies, online product datasheets constitute the only information source to evaluate their capabilities. Examples, [11] presents an evaluation of the LPWA Zigbee family but in a deserted area, while [6] evaluates the LoRa LPWA solution in a small-scale multiple building roof deployment. Likewise, [11] provides a comparison between CC1200-DK and LoRa iM880A but is based on line of sight (LoS) and semi-line of sight (in moderately/heavily wooden areas) experiments only.…”
Section: Prior Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples, [11] presents an evaluation of the LPWA Zigbee family but in a deserted area, while [6] evaluates the LoRa LPWA solution in a small-scale multiple building roof deployment. Likewise, [11] provides a comparison between CC1200-DK and LoRa iM880A but is based on line of sight (LoS) and semi-line of sight (in moderately/heavily wooden areas) experiments only. The narrow selection of the environments and conditions of these experiments are unable to define the real limitations of LPWA technologies under the context of IoT applications.…”
Section: Prior Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been a few articles related to LoRa in the literature. In [ 13 , 14 ], different long-range technologies, including LoRa, are compared. Petajajarvi et al [ 15 ] studied the coverage of LoRa and proposed a channel attenuation model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%