2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvcir.2021.103202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance analysis of VVC intra coding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Multiple Reference Line (MRL) extends the number of lines and columns from neighbor blocks that can be used for the intra prediction process in comparison with HEVC [30]. Fig.…”
Section: Intra Prediction On Vvc Decodersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Multiple Reference Line (MRL) extends the number of lines and columns from neighbor blocks that can be used for the intra prediction process in comparison with HEVC [30]. Fig.…”
Section: Intra Prediction On Vvc Decodersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the enhanced coding mode, VVC adopts multiple reference lines (MRL) [6] [7], Matrix weighted intra prediction (MIP) [8] [9], Intra Sub-Partitions (ISP) [10], and 4-tap interpolation filter to improve coding performance. FIGURE 2: Intra Prediction processing flow modified from [11] The IP coding control is shown in Fig. 2, modified from concurrent processing [11] to sequential.…”
Section: Figure 1: 2×(w+h)+1 Reference Pixels From Neighboring Blocksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FIGURE 2: Intra Prediction processing flow modified from [11] The IP coding control is shown in Fig. 2, modified from concurrent processing [11] to sequential. When reference pixels are ready for a CU, the coder will find 2∼3 best, depending on CU size, from the 35 prediction angles of HEVC, and then test the left and right to the best ones to refine the prediction.…”
Section: Figure 1: 2×(w+h)+1 Reference Pixels From Neighboring Blocksmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, our method is able to achieve closer performance for a more complex encoder when only predicting the set of IPMs to be tested during the FIPMD. For instance, the use of MIP and ISP enhanced the coding efficiency with about 2% [32] at the expense of 10% and 15% [33] of complexity overhead, respectively. The best performance of our method is presented for the video RaceHorsesC with about 30% of complexity reduction for only 1.03% of BD-BR increase.…”
Section: Complexity Reduction Under Vtmmentioning
confidence: 99%