2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00521-018-3518-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance analysis of various machine learning-based approaches for detection and classification of lung cancer in humans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
56
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
56
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Naveen and Pradeep (2018) proposed that among SVM, Naive Bayes and C4.5 classifier, C4.5 performs better on North central cancer treatment group (NCCTG) lung cancer data with better accuracy and also predicted that C4.5 is better classifier with the increase of lung cancer training data [ 25 ]. Gur Amrit Pal singh and P.K Gupta (2018) proposed new algorithm for feature extraction on image data and applied machine learning classifier to improve the accuracy [ 29 ]. Hussein et al (2019) proposed supervised learning using 3D Convolutional neural network(3D CNN)on lung nodules data set as well as unsupervised learning SVM approach to classify benign and malignant data with a accuracy of 91% [ 12 ].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Naveen and Pradeep (2018) proposed that among SVM, Naive Bayes and C4.5 classifier, C4.5 performs better on North central cancer treatment group (NCCTG) lung cancer data with better accuracy and also predicted that C4.5 is better classifier with the increase of lung cancer training data [ 25 ]. Gur Amrit Pal singh and P.K Gupta (2018) proposed new algorithm for feature extraction on image data and applied machine learning classifier to improve the accuracy [ 29 ]. Hussein et al (2019) proposed supervised learning using 3D Convolutional neural network(3D CNN)on lung nodules data set as well as unsupervised learning SVM approach to classify benign and malignant data with a accuracy of 91% [ 12 ].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the conventional automated system predicts lung cancer successfully, it continues to maintain its accuracy of recognition [19] and also takes longer to handle large volumes of data. The successful method for the identification of lung cancer, which has been discovered by Singh and Gupta [20], classifies photos of lung cancer as benign and malicious. The various computer classifications include Naïve Bay classifier, decision trees classifier, descent classifier, k‐closest neighbour classifier, vector support classifier for supervised learning, random forest classifier, and neural network classification for lung cancer scoring.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some researchers use other approaches to optimize hyperparameters in Deep Learning. Research conducted by Qolomany et al [4] shows the success of the application of Deep Learning by optimizing parameters using the Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) method. PSO is very efficient in adjusting the number of optimal hidden layers and neurons.…”
Section: A R T I C L E I N F Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies in the health sector develop preprocessing on CT Scan image data to obtain better results. As was done by Singh and Gupta [4] to detect cases of classification of lung cancer, previously, the image was processed and produced texture features (GLCM) and statistical features. It used 7 (seven) different approaches, namely KNN, SVM, Decision Tree, Naïve Bayes, SGD, Random Forest and MLP (one type of Deep Learning architecture).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%