2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.01.233
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance analysis of two combined cycle power plants with different steam injection system design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Jahangiri et al [78] developed exergy, thermo-dynamical and economic analyses based on the effect of a flue gas injection system. While Kilani et al [79] analyzed the effect of two applications of steam injection within the combustion chamber. They obtained that with an adequate steam injection process which can improve the overall cycle efficiency up to 60%.…”
Section: Combined Cycle Gasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jahangiri et al [78] developed exergy, thermo-dynamical and economic analyses based on the effect of a flue gas injection system. While Kilani et al [79] analyzed the effect of two applications of steam injection within the combustion chamber. They obtained that with an adequate steam injection process which can improve the overall cycle efficiency up to 60%.…”
Section: Combined Cycle Gasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ganjehkaviri et al [26] have suggested that maintaining at 88% the steam quality at the turbine outlet station is a more realistic and feasible value for operating the ST in the CCPP at the optimum level. Kilani et al [27] made the comparison of CCPP in the two different structures in which the vapor in the fuel chamber is different In the first, the injected steam was produced in the HRSG, while the other was supplied using the HRSG placed at the outlet of the compressor. According to the results, the second project was more effective in increasing performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%