Packet Video 2007 2007
DOI: 10.1109/packet.2007.4397047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance analysis of the scalable video coding standard

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, [24] presents a complexity model for decoding a bit stream with temporal, spatial, or quality scalability. Furthermore, Ma and Wang [25] provided an overview of new features of the SVC standard, evaluating their rate-distortion performance and computational complexity. Still further, Tan et al [26] proposed a singularly parameterized complexity-scalable scheme for designing power-aware H.264-based video encoders.…”
Section: Complexity-rate-distortion (C-r-d) Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, [24] presents a complexity model for decoding a bit stream with temporal, spatial, or quality scalability. Furthermore, Ma and Wang [25] provided an overview of new features of the SVC standard, evaluating their rate-distortion performance and computational complexity. Still further, Tan et al [26] proposed a singularly parameterized complexity-scalable scheme for designing power-aware H.264-based video encoders.…”
Section: Complexity-rate-distortion (C-r-d) Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional video encoding does not distinguish peers of different ability, thus it does not provide different services according to the ability of the peers. In Scalable Video Coding [1][2] [3], peers can obtain videos of different quality according to their network conditions and ensure that the video is fluent. Since SVC was developed as an extension of H.264/AVC with all of its excellent core coding tools being inherited, it supports types of scalability, including temporal scalability, spatial scalability and quality scalability [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…H.264/SVC allocates different priority to the data blocks before transmission. The existing sorting algorithms include frame-based algorithm [5] and GOP (Group Of Picture) based algorithm [1] [5][6][7][8], among which the frame-based algorithm is of high complexity and good performance, while the GOP based algorithm is easy to implement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the trade-off between the SVC coding efficiency and computational complexity (and especially, from the ROI point of view) requires much deeper research [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%