Proceedings of the XXXVIII Iberian Latin American Congress on Computational Methods in Engineering 2017
DOI: 10.20906/cps/cilamce2017-0381
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance analysis of the MHM simulator in a petascale machine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A study on this direction demands expertise on the implementation of parallel algorithms, which is out of the scope of the present manuscript. We refer to [25,36] as some seminal works considering the performance of the MHM-H 1 method for elasticity. • The construction of a two-scale MHM-WS characterization for three-dimension MFEM-WS methods is feasible using a similar methodology, as in the 2D case presented in Theorem 4.2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A study on this direction demands expertise on the implementation of parallel algorithms, which is out of the scope of the present manuscript. We refer to [25,36] as some seminal works considering the performance of the MHM-H 1 method for elasticity. • The construction of a two-scale MHM-WS characterization for three-dimension MFEM-WS methods is feasible using a similar methodology, as in the 2D case presented in Theorem 4.2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is defined rowisely in the spirit of standard projection-based interpolants π D γ : H s (Ω, R 2 ) → V γ adopted for twoscale Poisson-compatible pairs {V γ , P γin }, with enhanced bubble flux components (see[19,20]). Recalling the definition of π D γ for the single-scale case (23)-(25), the two-scale version becomesπ D γ η = π D,∂ γ η+π D γin (η−π D,∂ γ η), where only the internal interpolantπ D γin has to be updated. A uniform bound for ||Π σ 1,γ τ || H(div,Ω,M) , independent of γ, follows from the same property valid for ||π D γ || H(div,Ω,R 2 ) .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%