2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00521-012-1324-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance analysis of support vector machines classifiers in breast cancer mammography recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
63
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 189 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A year after, another paper was published by the same group using PSO-SVM to analyse the WBCD data to achieve a 99.3% classification accuracy [87]. In 2014, five types of SVMs; proximal support vector machine (PSVM), finite Newton method for Lagrangian support vector machine (NSVM), linear programming support vector machine (LPSVM), Lagrangian support vector machine (LSVM), and smooth support vector machine (SSVM), were tested on WBCD data [88]. Overall accuracy was 97.20% in LPSVM, 96.60% in SSVM, 96.60% in NSVM, 96% in PSVM and 95.40% in LSVM.…”
Section: Svmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A year after, another paper was published by the same group using PSO-SVM to analyse the WBCD data to achieve a 99.3% classification accuracy [87]. In 2014, five types of SVMs; proximal support vector machine (PSVM), finite Newton method for Lagrangian support vector machine (NSVM), linear programming support vector machine (LPSVM), Lagrangian support vector machine (LSVM), and smooth support vector machine (SSVM), were tested on WBCD data [88]. Overall accuracy was 97.20% in LPSVM, 96.60% in SSVM, 96.60% in NSVM, 96% in PSVM and 95.40% in LSVM.…”
Section: Svmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If T P (true positive) is the number of focal EEG signals identified as focal EEG signals, T N (true negative) is the number of non-focal EEG signals classified as non-focal EEG signals, F P (false positive) is the number of non-focal EEG signals recognized as focal EEG signals and F N (false negative) is the number of focal EEG signals distinguished as non-focal EEG signals, then the mathematical expressions of the performance measure parameters are as follows [62,63]:…”
Section: Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To provide a more intuitive and easier-to-understand method to measure the prediction quality, the following equation set is often used in literature for examining performance quality as follows [32]: (22) where TP (true positive) represents the number of fatigue EEG signals identified as fatigue EEG signals; TN (true negative), the number of normal EEG signals classified as normal EEG signals; FP (false positive), the number of normal EEG signals recognized as fatigue EEG signals; FN (false negative), the number of fatigue EEG signals distinguished as normal EEG signals; Sn represents sensitivity; Sp represents specificity; Acc represents accuracy; and MCC represents Mathew's correlation coefficient.…”
Section: Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%