Performance analysis of SNMP in airborne tactical networks

Kuthethoor, Giri; Sesha, Prakash; Strohm, John; O'Neal, P.; Hadynski, Gregory; Climek, D.; DelMedico, J.; Kiwior, D.; Dunbrack, D.; Parker, David

doi:10.1109/milcom.2008.4753386

Cited by 4 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…More often than not, these solutions use the SNMP protocol in some way or another. In [9], SNMP performance in TENs are evaluated and the results show that SNMP was designed with high performance networks in mind. For example, each SNMP packet contains many fields such as version, community ID and an OID for each object in the variable-binding list, where OIDs sometimes requiring more space than the data itself.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

DDAM: Dynamic network condition detection and communication adaptation in Tactical Edge Networks

Fronteddu

Morelli

Tortonesi

et al. 2016

MILCOM 2016 - 2016 IEEE Military Communications Conference

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Tactical Edge Networks provide one of the most challenging communication environments. In order to cope with node mobility, constrained resources, and link unreliability, communication solutions designed for Tactical Edge Networks typically present highly configurable interfaces to be adaptable for various networking conditions. However, the extreme dynamicity and heterogeneity of tactical scenarios call for network-aware, adaptive communication systems that continuously re-tune their configuration parameters to match the ever-changing network conditions. This paper presents the Dynamic Detect and Adapt Mechanism (DDAM) of the Agile Communication Middleware, a distributed solution to perform network monitoring and communication adaptation specifically designed for Tactical Edge Networks. The present work focuses on two components of the DDAM: NetSensor, which provides efficient monitoring of the network status, and NetSupervisor, which is responsible for characterizing the network technology used to connect a pair of nodes in the network. The presented results show that our solution can accurately identify the technology used to establish links between nodes

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Another problem in using SNMP, as explained in [9], is that SNMP does not support Multicast with evident overhead implications in the polling phases. Our solution instead makes use of a Multicast Group for the delivery of update containing statistics and other information, thus reducing the overhead.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

DDAM: Dynamic network condition detection and communication adaptation in Tactical Edge Networks

Fronteddu

Morelli

Tortonesi

et al. 2016

MILCOM 2016 - 2016 IEEE Military Communications Conference

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In [19], the authors propose innovative ways to improve SNMP agent/manager interactions, specifically addressing the limitations of a bandwidth constrained tactical edge network. They analyze the performance improvements using a variety of aggregation techniques of multicast, reliable multicast and aggregation techniques to enhance the SNMP agent/manager interactions thus conserving bandwidth but still monitor and provide network situational awareness to the war fighter.…”

Section: Improving Network Servicesmentioning

confidence: 99%

MANET Approaches for Airborne Networks: A Survey

Kulla

Sakamoto

Ikeda

et al. 2013

2013 16th International Conference on Network-Based Information Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

An Airborne Network (AN) is defined as a form of MANET, containing at least one airborne node. But, the characteristics of the AN differ from the MANET significantly. The nodes of the AN are connected by much higher bandwidth links. The airborne nodes also have much greater line-of-sight distance that increases their possible connections. In this work, we present a survey on some aspects of ANs. We show the differences between the two network types and summarize some of the main works on AN research.

show abstract

MANET network management and performance monitoring for NHDP and OLSRv2

Herberg

Clausen

Cole

2010

2010 International Conference on Network and Service Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Mobile Ad Hoc NETworks (MANETs) are generally thought of as infrastructureless and largely "un-managed" network deployments, capable of accommodating highly dynamic network topologies. Yet, while the network infrastructure may be "un-managed", monitoring the network performance and setting configuration parameters once deployed, remains important in order to ensure proper "tuning" and maintenance of a MANET. This paper describes a management framework for the MANET routing protocol OLSRv2, and its constituent protocol NHDP. It does so by presenting considerations for "what to monitor and manage" in an OLSRv2 network, and how. The approach developed is based on the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP), and thus this paper details the various Management Information Bases (MIBs) for router status monitoring and control -as well as a novel approach to history-based performance monitoring. While SNMP may not be optimally designed for MANETs, it is chosen due to it being the predominant protocol for IP network management -and thus, efforts are made in this paper to "adapt" the management tools within the SNMP framework for reasonable behavior also in a MANET environment.

show abstract

Performance analysis of SNMP in airborne tactical networks

Cited by 4 publications

References 3 publications

DDAM: Dynamic network condition detection and communication adaptation in Tactical Edge Networks

DDAM: Dynamic network condition detection and communication adaptation in Tactical Edge Networks

MANET Approaches for Airborne Networks: A Survey

MANET network management and performance monitoring for NHDP and OLSRv2

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About