2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.icte.2021.10.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance analysis of physical-layer network coding with QPSK modulation in wireless IoT networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, it was proven that OFDM-based PNC is vulnerable to carrier frequency offset (CFO), which can be induced by node mobility and/or local oscillator (LO) mismatch between transmitters and receivers. This CFO cannot be estimated and eliminated in PNC at the relay node, which generally faces two different CFO values from the edge nodes A and B. CFO in PNC results in not only the inter-carrier interference (ICI) between the subcarriers of nodes A and B, but also a relative phase offset between the received constellations of nodes A and B, and both will cause performance loss in PNC, especially for high-order modulations including QPSK [50] [51]. The rationale behind this first set of experiments is to evaluate our MAC protocol under different modulations in order to figure out the more appropriate PHY configuration to obtain the best performances.…”
Section: Results Of the Twrc Topologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, it was proven that OFDM-based PNC is vulnerable to carrier frequency offset (CFO), which can be induced by node mobility and/or local oscillator (LO) mismatch between transmitters and receivers. This CFO cannot be estimated and eliminated in PNC at the relay node, which generally faces two different CFO values from the edge nodes A and B. CFO in PNC results in not only the inter-carrier interference (ICI) between the subcarriers of nodes A and B, but also a relative phase offset between the received constellations of nodes A and B, and both will cause performance loss in PNC, especially for high-order modulations including QPSK [50] [51]. The rationale behind this first set of experiments is to evaluate our MAC protocol under different modulations in order to figure out the more appropriate PHY configuration to obtain the best performances.…”
Section: Results Of the Twrc Topologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They referred DF Scheme as 3-a step scheme, and all others relaying as a 2-step scheme. In [14], the authors analyzed the performance of PNC, which employs QPSK modulation for (Internet of Things) IoT networks. The proposed model considered multiple antennas at the relay node.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They referred DF Scheme as 3-step scheme and all other relaying as 2-step schemes. In [15], authors analyzed the performance of PNC that employs QPSK modulation for IoT networks. The proposed model considered multiple antennas at the relay node.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%