2016
DOI: 10.1002/dac.3149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance analysis of OFDM based AF cooperative systems in selection combining receiver over Nakagami‐m fading channels with nonlinear power amplifier

Abstract: Summary In this paper, performance analysis of orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) based amplify‐and‐forward (AF) cooperative relaying network with selection combining (SC) scheme over independently but not necessarily identically distributed (i.n.i.d.) frequency selective Nakagami‐m fading channels is investigated. Theoretical analysis of closed‐form expressions for outage probability and average symbol error rate (ASER) have been proposed, while considering nonlinear distortions (NLD) introduce… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 39 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More specifically, all these impairments can affect the performance of the wireless link and make it unreliable for transmission. Therefore, diversity techniques have been proposed to alleviate the effect of multipath fading and hence improve the overall performance of the communication system [5][6][7][8]. This is based on providing multiple fading channels between the transmitter and receiver to reduce the probability of error.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, all these impairments can affect the performance of the wireless link and make it unreliable for transmission. Therefore, diversity techniques have been proposed to alleviate the effect of multipath fading and hence improve the overall performance of the communication system [5][6][7][8]. This is based on providing multiple fading channels between the transmitter and receiver to reduce the probability of error.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%