Performance analysis of multicast routing protocols using NS-3

Sharma, Neelam; Singh, B. M.; Singh, Karan

doi:10.1109/incite.2016.7857604

Cited by 8 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Basing their work on some performance metrics (i.e., end to end delay, packet delivery ratio and routing overhead), Sharma et al conducted experiments to assess the performance of two selected MANET routing protocols [33]. Their findings indicated that MAODV outperforms the AODV in case of high mobility rate while AODV perform better when there is low mobility rate.…”

Section: Manetmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mobile Ad Hoc Network Routing Protocols: Performance Evaluation and Assessment

Elsadig¹,

Fadlalla²

2018

IJCDS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Recently a great deal of attention has been paid to Mobile Ad Hoc Networks (MANETs) due to their important roles in many different applications that include, but are not limited to: civil, military, and health applications. This kind of network can reach places that difficult for human beings to reach such as disaster areas. In spite of the rapid development of MANET technologies, the routing process still poses a real challenge due to the high mobility and dynamic topology features of such networks. This paper presents an investigation into some popular MANET routing protocols. This investigation aims to evaluate the performance of MANET routing protocols using the key performance indicators: throughput, end to end delay, and data packet delivery ratio. These indicators are commonly used in such evaluations. Our investigation results showed that DSR and AODV outperform DSDV. In a high-density network (a network with a large number of nodes), AODV outperforms DSR; while, in a low-density network the DSR performs better than the AODV. So, DSR is applicable for small networks; while AODV is applicable for large networks.

show abstract

Section: Manetmentioning

confidence: 99%