ICC 2020 - 2020 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/icc40277.2020.9148841
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Analysis of Mobile Cellular-Connected Drones under Practical Antenna Configurations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lemma 1: The in-phase/quadrature (I/Q) decomposition of the composite received signal R(t) is represented as R = Z + Y + N . The IQ components of the AWGN, N I and N Q (such that N = N I + N Q ) are i.i.d Gaussian random variables, each distributed as ∼ N (0, N 0 /2) [31], [32], and the IQ-decomposition for the aggregate interference is given in (20), where ρ i,u = T 0 g u (t − τ i )g u (t) dt is the crosscorrelation between the transmit and receive waveforms for the i-th nearest UE, and {ρ i,u } is a sequence of i.i.d random variables with ρ i,u ∼ U[0, 1]. Similarly, I/Q decomposition of the SOI is given in (21), where η = η NLoS /η LoS , and…”
Section: Drone Detection In Rf Sensing Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Lemma 1: The in-phase/quadrature (I/Q) decomposition of the composite received signal R(t) is represented as R = Z + Y + N . The IQ components of the AWGN, N I and N Q (such that N = N I + N Q ) are i.i.d Gaussian random variables, each distributed as ∼ N (0, N 0 /2) [31], [32], and the IQ-decomposition for the aggregate interference is given in (20), where ρ i,u = T 0 g u (t − τ i )g u (t) dt is the crosscorrelation between the transmit and receive waveforms for the i-th nearest UE, and {ρ i,u } is a sequence of i.i.d random variables with ρ i,u ∼ U[0, 1]. Similarly, I/Q decomposition of the SOI is given in (21), where η = η NLoS /η LoS , and…”
Section: Drone Detection In Rf Sensing Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the authors in [19], study the impact of a mixed LoS/NLoS A2G channel on the performance of a droneassisted heterogeneous networks, possible impacts of 3D antenna patterns were ignored. Some other recent papers [20], [21] considered dedicated ground BSs serving a network of drones under practical 3D antenna patterns. While the cellular coverage performance of the network was studied in these recent works, passive sensing performance of drones has not been taken into account.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…video provisioning [23], mobile edge computing [24], and aerial information sensing [25], can be a key solution for MBS services in cellular networks. In order to use the drones for cellular networks, theoretical performance analysis under consideration of practical antenna configurations [26] and mobility patterns [27] is essentially required.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Receiving beamforming has been considered a promising technology for cellular communication to address the serves interference issue and support the emerging UAV applications [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]. Through adaptively adjusting the antenna radiation patterns, the array elements at BS could be combined constructively or destructively to form the peaks and nulls in the antenna beam, which provides the benefits of simultaneously enhancing the signal transmission and mitigating the adverse interferences [8]. The accurate Direction-of-arrival (DoA) estimation plays an important role in beamforming algorithms to achieve the optimal antenna response.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%