Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2022
DOI: 10.32604/csse.2022.023256
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithms for Classifying Hand Motion-Based EEG Brain Signals

Abstract: Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) records brain activity using electroencephalogram (EEG) headsets in the form of EEG signals; these signals can be recorded, processed and classified into different hand movements, which can be used to control other IoT devices. Classification of hand movements will be one step closer to applying these algorithms in real-life situations using EEG headsets. This paper uses different feature extraction techniques and sophisticated machine learning algorithms to classify hand movem… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, we changed the method of EEG feature extraction proposed in this paper to improve the prediction accuracy of the model. Altameem et al (2022) is the application of EEG in brain computer interface motor imagery (BCI-MI), and their research shows that XGBoost using FFT features in EEG achieves 88% accuracy [37]. Although the above studies come from different fields, it also indicates that our study has certain novelty and effectiveness compared with the current mainstream methods.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Nevertheless, we changed the method of EEG feature extraction proposed in this paper to improve the prediction accuracy of the model. Altameem et al (2022) is the application of EEG in brain computer interface motor imagery (BCI-MI), and their research shows that XGBoost using FFT features in EEG achieves 88% accuracy [37]. Although the above studies come from different fields, it also indicates that our study has certain novelty and effectiveness compared with the current mainstream methods.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…However, due to the mechanics of matrix convolutions in the CNNs, the convolutions are carried out over the entire scalogram in the first stage as well as the subsequent convolution stages. Features extracted from the scalogram are also combined into feature vectors for input to many other classifiers such as support vector machines (SVMs) [7,[12][13][14][15], random forests (RFs) [16,17], k-nearest neighbor (k-NN) [15,18,19], and multilayer perceptron (MLP) neural networks [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%