2019 IEEE International Conference on E-Health Networking, Application &Amp; Services (HealthCom) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/healthcom46333.2019.9009442
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithms for Fall Detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Motivation for replacing SVM with XGBoost in [52] is also lacking. We find it peculiar that SVM was replaced since SVM outperformed NB in the other works [13,51].…”
Section: Fall Detectionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Motivation for replacing SVM with XGBoost in [52] is also lacking. We find it peculiar that SVM was replaced since SVM outperformed NB in the other works [13,51].…”
Section: Fall Detectionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Again, kNN performed best. In a follow up work, Ramachandran et al (2019Ramachandran et al ( , 2020 [51,52] explored the effect on performance of combining IMU and HR data in fall detection. A labelled dataset was created by asking 10 young healthy participants (gender not reported) to perform 14 ADLs and six different falls, twice, while wearing a smartwatch.…”
Section: Fall Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Experiments were performed across 20 different ADL/fall activity simulations, such as walking, running, climbing stairs, abrupt movements and various types of falls, in controlled environments. One of our previous papers describes the details on the fall simulation and dataset collection process [26]. Basic preprocessing was then performed on the data set.…”
Section: Data Collection Pre-processing and Baseline Performance Prof...mentioning
confidence: 99%