2006
DOI: 10.1561/9781933019796
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Analysis of Linear Codes under Maximum-Likelihood Decoding: A Tutorial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
117
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
117
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, we conclude this chapter with a brief section outlining possible extensions of the union bound for BICM to the region beyond the cutoff rate. We chiefly use the results reported in Sason and Shamai's monograph on improved bounds beyond the cutoff rate [101].…”
Section: Error Probability Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Finally, we conclude this chapter with a brief section outlining possible extensions of the union bound for BICM to the region beyond the cutoff rate. We chiefly use the results reported in Sason and Shamai's monograph on improved bounds beyond the cutoff rate [101].…”
Section: Error Probability Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spurred by the appearance of turbo-codes [11] and the rediscovery of LDPC codes [69], there has been renewed interest in the past decade in the derivation of improved bounds for a region above the cutoff rate. A comprehensive review can be found in the monograph by Sason and Shamai [101]. In this section, we briefly discuss such bounds for BICM.…”
Section: Bounds and Approximations Above The Cutoff Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Upper bounds on the maximum a posteriori (MAP) decoding error probability, as a key technique for evaluating the performance of the binary linear codes over additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) channels, bring a profound impact on the reliable transmission of the next-generation mobile communication systems since they can be used to not only predict the performance without resorting to computer simulations but also guide the design of coding [1]. In order to improve the looseness of the union bound in the low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) region, many improved upper bounds, on the bit error probability [2][3][4][5] and on the frame error probability [2][3][4][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15], are proposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to improve the looseness of the union bound in the low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) region, many improved upper bounds, on the bit error probability [2][3][4][5] and on the frame error probability [2][3][4][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15], are proposed. As surveyed in [1], the improved upper bounds on the bit error probability [2][3][4] are based on Gallager's first bounding technique (GFBT):…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%