Performance analysis of H.264, H.265, VP9 and AV1 video encoders

Layek, Md. Abu; Thai, Ngo Quang; Hossain, Alamgir; Thu, Ngo Thien; Tuyen, Le Pham; Talukder, Ashis; Chung, T. J.; Huh, Eui‐Nam

doi:10.1109/apnoms.2017.8094162

Cited by 22 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…And the intra period was set to 16 pictures. This choice is motivated by the fact that, first, this kind of RA configuration is typically chosen for all broadcasting and streaming applications, and second, it provides in most cases better results in terms of coding efficiency compared to low delay configurations [3]. And the command lines for the test encoders are presented in Table 1.…”

Section: Selected Encodersmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…At present, most of the hardware and software of computers, Smartphones or HDTVs support video encoding and decoding with this standard. In quest of even a better encoder which can meet the new challenges posed by dramatic usage of video resources, a similar effort by the same group proposed the High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) also known as H.265 [3]. The third generation of Audio Video coding Standard (AVS3) is developed by the AVS working group and aims to fulfill the requirement of 8K video transmission with the emerging 5G infrastructure.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Depth Map Video Compression Performance Evaluation For Ieee 1857.9

Cai

Wang

Qiu

et al. 2021

2021 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia &Amp; Expo Workshops (ICMEW)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In 6 Degrees of Freedom (6DoF) Video, it provides 360 video considering both user's head and body movement. In IEEE 1857.9 6DoF video expression, synthesizing the virtual view in accordance with the user's movement is required. During the view synthesis process, the reference software provided by IEEE 1857.9 requires a depth map as auxiliary information. In order to reuse existing video coding standards and quickly apply them to the industry, IEEE 1857.9 provides four depth map compression interfaces for AVC, HEVC, AVS2, and AVS3(First stage HPM4.0). In addition, the depth information is never directly shown to the user. Thus, new comparison methods have to be developed that are adapted to the depth maps compression. In this paper, we investigate the depth video compression performance of the software encoders of H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, and AVS3 respectively. To ensure fair analysis, we evaluate the performance of the encoder by comparing the objective quality of the virtual synthetic view. We use the reference software of IEEE 1857.9 for synthesizing the virtual view. Regarding coding performance evaluation, PSNR and SSIM are used as objective quality metrics. According to the experimental results, which were obtained by using similar configurations for all examined representative encoders, the AVS3 reference software implementation provides significant average bit-rate savings of 63% and 19% compared to H.264/AVC and H.265/HEVC respectively.

show abstract

Section: Selected Encodersmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Depth Map Video Compression Performance Evaluation For Ieee 1857.9

Cai

Wang

Qiu

et al. 2021

2021 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia &Amp; Expo Workshops (ICMEW)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Beberapa penelitian juga telah dilakukan untuk membandingkan kualitas dan kinerja teknik pengkodean video. Penelitian yang dilakukan oleh (Rizal et al, 2020) Penelitian selanjutnya dilakukan oleh (Layek et al, 2017) bertujuan untuk memastikan analisis yang adil dengan penggunaan parameter berbeda. Dengan parameter default, untuk bitrate video yang sama, AV1 memperoleh kualitas yang lebih baik dibandingkan dengan pengkodean lainnya.…”

Section: Pendahuluanunclassified

“…Ada banyak teknik pengkodean video yang tersedia, tetapi H.264 / AVC (Wiegand et al, 2003) dan H.265 / HEVC (Sullivan et al, 2012) adalah dua standar pengkodean video terbaru yang dikembangkan oleh Video Coding Expert Group (VCEG) dan ISO / IEC Moving Picture Expert Group (MPEG). H.264 dianggap sebagai standar yang matang (Layek et al, 2017) dan banyak digunakan untuk berbagai aplikasi baik real-time maupun non real-time. Sedangkan H.265 merupakan evolusi dari pendahulunya dengan target penghematan bitrate 50% tetapi memiliki kualitas encoding yang serupa (Akyazi & Ebrahimi, 2018).…”

Section: Pendahuluanunclassified

Analisis Perbandingan Teknik Video Codec H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, VP9 dan AV1

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Video applications consume more energy on the Internet and can be accessed by electronic devices, due to an increase in the consumption of high-resolution and high-quality video content, presenting serious issues to delivery infrastructure that needs higher video compression technologies. The focus of this paper is to evaluate the quality of the most current codec, AV1, to its predecessor codec. The comparison was made experimentally at two video resolutions (1080p and 720p) by sampling video frames with various CRF/CQP values and testing several parameters analyses such as encoding duration, compression ratio, bit rate, Mean Square Error (MSE), and Peak Signal to Noise Ratio (PSNR). The AV1 codec is very great in terms of quality and file size, even though it is slower in terms of compression speed. The H.265/HEVC codec, on the other side, beats the other codec in terms of compression ratio. In conclusion, the H.265/HEVC codec is suggested as a material for obtaining a well compressed video with small file size and a short time.

show abstract

“…AV1 is based on VP9 with additional tools aiming to gain better coding efficiency than other state-of-the-art codecs. The performance of the different codecs has been compared in [13,14,15,16,17]. In this paper, their performance is evaluated for coding of light field pseudo-video sequences.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%