2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-4762-6_67
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Analysis of Gene Expression Data Using Mann–Whitney U Test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To determine the dominantly expressed homoeolog for a given gene pair (homoeolog pairs), their TPM values were compared: Greater or less was recorded, and the relative expression fold—dominant over submissive—was calculated. We also used the non-parametric statistical test of the Mann-Whitney-U test ( 65 ) in the Python package SciPy to identify the significance of differentially expressed gene pairs from a subset of genes. Gene pairs with P value < 0.05 were considered significantly differentially expressed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine the dominantly expressed homoeolog for a given gene pair (homoeolog pairs), their TPM values were compared: Greater or less was recorded, and the relative expression fold—dominant over submissive—was calculated. We also used the non-parametric statistical test of the Mann-Whitney-U test ( 65 ) in the Python package SciPy to identify the significance of differentially expressed gene pairs from a subset of genes. Gene pairs with P value < 0.05 were considered significantly differentially expressed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Statistical significance was determined by unpaired t -tests or Mann–Whitney tests using the GraphPad Prism v. 7.0 software. The non-parametric Mann–Whitney tests routinely used to improve the analysis of the gene expression data to detect the differences between the median value of the groups with more power and strict approach than the other tests [30]. Differences between groups were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Mann–Whitney analysis 34 (a nonparametric test that compares the medians of two different samples) was performed for the data of Sauter mean diameter between conditions (constant stirred speed and constant power input). Statistical analysis was performed using Statgraphics Centurion XVI software.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where X vol,j is the fraction of accumulated volume of the jth class; X vol,j−1 is the fraction of accumulated volume of the ( j − 1)th class; xj is the fraction of accumulated volume contained in class j; V j is the volume of the jth class; m is the total number of classes; f j is the frequency in the jth class; and d j is the diameter of the jth class. A Mann-Whitney analysis 34 (a nonparametric test that compares the medians of two different samples) was performed for the data of Sauter mean diameter between conditions (constant stirred speed and constant power input). Statistical analysis was performed using Statgraphics Centurion XVI software.…”
Section: Determination Of Bubble Size Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%