2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.sigpro.2017.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance analysis of distributed source parameter estimator (DSPE) in the presence of modeling errors due to the spatial distributions of sources

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors of [10] have developed an efficient DSPE algorithm and proposed a generalized beamforming estimator for CD sources in [11]. Generally, the parameters of CD sources are approximate solutions under the assumption of small angular spreads, the performance of DSPE algorithm is analyzed in [12]. All these methods are based on 1D CD source models, which assume that scatterers and arrays are in the same plane.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The authors of [10] have developed an efficient DSPE algorithm and proposed a generalized beamforming estimator for CD sources in [11]. Generally, the parameters of CD sources are approximate solutions under the assumption of small angular spreads, the performance of DSPE algorithm is analyzed in [12]. All these methods are based on 1D CD source models, which assume that scatterers and arrays are in the same plane.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Supposing that signals from different CD sources are coherent, sample covariance matrices are rank defect. Thus, subspace-based algorithms [1,[6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] and ESPRIT class algorithms [15,16] which are based on eigendecomposition of sample covariance matrices cannot be applied for DOA estimation of distributed sources. Subspace-based algorithms and ESPRIT class algorithms are based on decomposition of covariance matrix.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As to CD sources, utilizing different array configurations representative estimators have been proposed in [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10], which are mostly based on rotational invariance relationship derived by Taylor approximation of generalized steering vectors. For ID sources, several algorithms have been presented and can be roughly divided into four categories: subspace-based algorithms developed from multiple signal classification (MUSIC) such as distributed signal parameter estimator (DSPE) [1] and dispersed signal parametric estimation (DSPARE) [11], generalizations of Capon's methods [12][13][14] involving high-order matrix inversions and spectral searches, the maximum likelihood (ML) approaches [15][16][17] requiring high computational complexity but with better accuracy, and covariance matching estimation techniques (COMET) [18][19][20][21] with lower computational complexity than ML approach but the same large sample behavior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the presence of model errors, the performance of DSPE algorithm is analyzed in [8], and the performance of MUSIC is analyzed in [9]. Considering mismodeling of the spatial distribution of distributed sources, a robust estimator is proposed in [10] by means of exploiting some properties of the generalized steering vector in the case of CD sources and the covariance matrix in the case of ID sources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%