2020
DOI: 10.1155/2020/4915638
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Analysis of Cooperative NOMA Systems with Incremental Relaying

Abstract: In this paper, we investigate the performance of the non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) system with incremental relaying, where the relay is employed with amplify-and-forward (AF) or decode-and-forward (DF) protocols. To characterize the outage behaviors of the incremental cooperative NOMA (ICN) system, new closed-form expressions of both exact and asymptotic outage probability for two users are derived. In addition, the performance of the conventional cooperative NOMA (CCN) system is analyzed as a benchmar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(57 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Without loss of generality, the SIC's decoding order is determined by effective users' channel gains, which are in ascending order, that is, |h1|2|h2|2${{| {{h_{1}}} |}^2} \ge {{| {{h_{2}}} |}^2}$. According to [42], γ1,2badbreak=α2γ2ht2h22γ2ht2h12α1+γ(ht2+h12)+1$$\begin{equation} {\gamma _{{1,2}}} = \frac{{{\alpha _2}{\gamma ^2}{{{\left| {{{h}_{t}}} \right|}}^2}{{{\left| {{{h}_{2}}} \right|}}^2}}}{{{\gamma ^2}{{{\left| {{{h}_{t}}} \right|}}^2}{{{\left| {{{h}_{1}}} \right|}}^2}{\alpha _1} + \gamma {\big({{{{\left| {{{h}_{t}}} \right|}}^2} + {{{\left| {{{h}_{1}}} \right|}}^2}} \big)} + 1}} \end{equation}$$represents the signal‐to‐interference (SNR) noise ratio for User1 to decode s 2 by using SIC processing. After User2's message has been decoded and removed, User1 decodes its own signal by matching the signal‐to‐interference noise ratio (SINR) (γ 1 ) between the relay and User1.…”
Section: System Model and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Without loss of generality, the SIC's decoding order is determined by effective users' channel gains, which are in ascending order, that is, |h1|2|h2|2${{| {{h_{1}}} |}^2} \ge {{| {{h_{2}}} |}^2}$. According to [42], γ1,2badbreak=α2γ2ht2h22γ2ht2h12α1+γ(ht2+h12)+1$$\begin{equation} {\gamma _{{1,2}}} = \frac{{{\alpha _2}{\gamma ^2}{{{\left| {{{h}_{t}}} \right|}}^2}{{{\left| {{{h}_{2}}} \right|}}^2}}}{{{\gamma ^2}{{{\left| {{{h}_{t}}} \right|}}^2}{{{\left| {{{h}_{1}}} \right|}}^2}{\alpha _1} + \gamma {\big({{{{\left| {{{h}_{t}}} \right|}}^2} + {{{\left| {{{h}_{1}}} \right|}}^2}} \big)} + 1}} \end{equation}$$represents the signal‐to‐interference (SNR) noise ratio for User1 to decode s 2 by using SIC processing. After User2's message has been decoded and removed, User1 decodes its own signal by matching the signal‐to‐interference noise ratio (SINR) (γ 1 ) between the relay and User1.…”
Section: System Model and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TX sends a superimposed signal to the relay during the first time slot in accordance with NOMA concepts. The achievable rates (R RS x1 and R RS x2 ) for the relay to decode x 1 and x 2 are given [49] by…”
Section: B Transmission Between Rs and Ue 1) Application Of Df Coding...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It then removes x 1 from the y RS in (12) to detect x 2 . By employing successive interference cancellation (SIC), the signal-to-interference ratio (SINR) (γ DF 1,2 ) at UE 1 to detect x 2 is given [49] by…”
Section: B Transmission Between Rs and Ue 1) Application Of Df Coding...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in a quickly fading wireless environment, the measured channel state information (CSI) for relay selection may difer from the actual channel quality at the time of signal relaying due to processing and feedback delays. As frequently demonstrated in [13][14][15][16][17], obsolete CSI results in incorrect relay selection, which signifcantly degrades ORS performance.…”
Section: Cooperative Communicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%