1999
DOI: 10.1109/18.771253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance analysis of a decoding algorithm for algebraic-geometry codes

Abstract:  Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research.  You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain  You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the q = 4 code, note how the success probability at τ + 1 errors is very close to q −2 = 6.25%. As previously discussed, this is exactly the asymptotic (for q → ∞) probability that deg H Λ < |E|+ g [28], [29], in which case we due to Proposition 30 should expect Power decoding to succeed. The success probability seems better at τ + 1 for the q = 5 code, where q −2 = 4%.…”
Section: A Failure Probabilitysupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the q = 4 code, note how the success probability at τ + 1 errors is very close to q −2 = 6.25%. As previously discussed, this is exactly the asymptotic (for q → ∞) probability that deg H Λ < |E|+ g [28], [29], in which case we due to Proposition 30 should expect Power decoding to succeed. The success probability seems better at τ + 1 for the q = 5 code, where q −2 = 4%.…”
Section: A Failure Probabilitysupporting
confidence: 58%
“…However, simulations indicate that for random error patterns, the error locator most likely has the maximal order |E| + g; most likely, the error locator for either codeword will satisfy this, and so the closest codeword will again have the lowest-order error locator. The probability of the errors lying such that deg H Λ < |E| + g was shown to be 1/q asymptotically [28], [29].…”
Section: Proofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under the BerlekampMassey-Sakata algorithm with majority voting, an error vector whose weight is larger than half the minimum distance of the code is often correctable. In particular this occurs for generic errors (also called independent errors in [16,17]), whose technical algebraic definition can be found in [18]. Generic errors of weight t can be a very large proportion of all possible errors of weight t, as in the case of the examples worked out in [15].…”
Section: Minimizing Redundancy For Correcting Generic Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that this condition is equivalent to det where Φ with det x l φ m = 0 is said to be generic, and [16], where such a Φ is said to be independent.…”
Section: Systematic Encoding Regarded As Erasure-only Decodingmentioning
confidence: 99%