4th International Workshop on Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks (BSN 2007)
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-70994-7_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Analysis of 802.15.4 and 802.11e for Body Sensor Network Applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both [76] and [77] come to the conclusion that although 802.15.4 can provide QoS, the technology is not scalable in terms of power consumption and can not be used as a single solution for all WBAN applications.…”
Section: Mac Layermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both [76] and [77] come to the conclusion that although 802.15.4 can provide QoS, the technology is not scalable in terms of power consumption and can not be used as a single solution for all WBAN applications.…”
Section: Mac Layermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kim et al [6] propose a high efficient routing method based on the energy levels of GPS and sensor nodes. [7,8] evaluate the energy consumption of ZigBee protocol when applying in WBAN and point out that ZigBee protocol is not suitable to apply in WBAN unless being improved. [9] suggests a dynamic schedule solution based on Bluetooth, in which the sensor nodes switch between connection status and sleep through self-adaption and as a result less energy is consumed by the nodes.…”
Section: Research Statusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, this standard operates in 2.4 GHz band, which allows the possibilities of interference from other devices such as IEEE 802.11 and microwave. Dave et al studied the energy efficiency and QoS performance of IEEE 802.15.4 and IEEE 802.11e [35] MAC protocols under two generic applications: a wave-form real time stream and a real-time parameter measurement stream [36]. Table 2 shows the Packet Delivery Ratio and the Power (in mW) for both applications.…”
Section: Mac Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%