1994
DOI: 10.1016/0003-2670(94)85027-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance advances in ion mobility spectrometry through combination with high speed vapor sampling, preconcentration and separation techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Precedent for such advances have been reported for derivatives of CAM instrumentation where dilution and preconcentration inlets where employed to provide straight response curves for log -log plots of response versus concentration. 26 Such strategies provide both models and confidence that the limitations in the desorber employed here were based upon design only and are not intrinsic barriers.…”
Section: Assessment Of Combined Elisa-ims Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Precedent for such advances have been reported for derivatives of CAM instrumentation where dilution and preconcentration inlets where employed to provide straight response curves for log -log plots of response versus concentration. 26 Such strategies provide both models and confidence that the limitations in the desorber employed here were based upon design only and are not intrinsic barriers.…”
Section: Assessment Of Combined Elisa-ims Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an elegant set of experiments performed in a GC-IMS system, 12 it was clearly observed ( Figure 6 of reference 12) that the order of elution for the CWA simulants was the same in both the IMS and GC; thus, the GC separation correlates with that of the IMS. This conclusion is also based on common knowledge that the GC separation is based on volatility that is generally reduced with the molecular size and weight, while the IMS ion drifting time is based on ion mobility, which is similarly reduced with the molecular size and weight.…”
Section: Orthogonal Gc and Pfpd Separation For The Elimination Of Falmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, considerable effort was devoted to the coupling of both the IMS [12][13][14] and the flame photometric detector (FPD) 15 with a second dimension of separation of a gas chromatograph (GC). Ideally, if the separation technique, such as GC, is orthogonal (independent from and does not relate) to the detection technique (IMS or FPD), the total system separation power could be markedly increased and become the multiplicity of the separation powers of both techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, a major advantage of the instrument is that it contains an automatic attenuation control, which extends the linear dynamic range of the instrument. 21 The narrow linear dynamic range of IMS has been one of its primary limitations. Disadvantages of operating the GC/ IMS under reduced pressures are that both chromatographic and ion mobility spectrometric resolution are decreased and the sensitivity of the IMS is reduced due to the low-pressure operation of the ionization region and drift tube.…”
Section: Portable Gc/imsmentioning
confidence: 99%