1993
DOI: 10.1300/j147v17n01_05
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance, Accountability, and Purchase of Service Contracting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, for some contracts, the outcomes or impacts are not easily identified. A longer period of time is needed to measure the impacts of the contract (Claassen et al, 2008;Greiling, 2006;Kettner & Martin, 1993). This longer contract duration influences the behaviors of the contracting parties in their relationship.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, for some contracts, the outcomes or impacts are not easily identified. A longer period of time is needed to measure the impacts of the contract (Claassen et al, 2008;Greiling, 2006;Kettner & Martin, 1993). This longer contract duration influences the behaviors of the contracting parties in their relationship.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally discussed under the heading "privatization," some research has examined the performance of private companies in providing services such as fire protection, solid waste disposal, operation of transit systems, and the like (see Savas 1987). Other research has described efforts on the part of state and local governments to employ private or nonprofit organizations to provide social services such as corrections, mental health, and education (Council of State Governments 1993; Kettner and Martin 1993;U.S. General Accounting Office 1996).…”
Section: The Efficiency Of Organizational Types In Providing Governmementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these two fields, more than 80% of the growth in the number of facilities was in the for-profit sector (Kettner & Martin, 1993;Ryan, 1997;U.S. Between 1973 and 1984, for-profit firms' share of all government social service contracts grew from less than 1% to 23%.…”
Section: Battling the Corporate Social Workermentioning
confidence: 99%