2018
DOI: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2018-200145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perforation of the anterior cervix by the threads of an intrauterine device

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally of those 1821 articles after assessment and removal of duplicates 8 were selected for inclusion in the review, all case reports. In total 8 patients were enrolled in the review .Articles dated from April of 1977 to October of 2018 and all were written in English [6,7,10,11,12,13,14,15] .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Finally of those 1821 articles after assessment and removal of duplicates 8 were selected for inclusion in the review, all case reports. In total 8 patients were enrolled in the review .Articles dated from April of 1977 to October of 2018 and all were written in English [6,7,10,11,12,13,14,15] .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mean months since the insertion of the IUD in the 8 cases (100%) were 26,00±24,00 SD(standard deviation),range (1-72) months. In 7 cases (87,5%) the area of perforation was located in the anterior fornix [6,7,11,12,13,14] and 1 case (12,5%) the area of perforation was located in the posterior fornix [10].The distance between cervical os and the area of perforation of strings was reported in 7 case reports ;the mean distance was 9,78±4,94 mm SD (range 5-20 mm) [6,7,10,12,13,14,15].…”
Section: Case Reportsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations