2011
DOI: 10.1590/s0004-27492011000400015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perfluoroctano em cavidade orbitária após vitrectomia posterior e sutura de perfurante ocular: relato de caso

Abstract: RESUMOO objetivo é relatar, pela primeira vez, o caso de um paciente submetido à vitrectomia posterior e sutura de perfurante ocular que evoluiu com extravasamento de perfluoroctano para cavidade orbitária. Paciente do sexo masculino, 39 anos, hígido, encaminhado para avaliação oftalmológica após ter sofrido trauma no olho direito com pedaço de metal há um dia. Ao exame, apresentava redução súbita da acuidade visual à direita com ferimento perfurante ocular córneo-escleral, corpo estranho intraocular e descola… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Three other cases have been reported in the literature of the development of emphysema after PFO instillation, but none of these were thought to be directly due to a PFO-related injury. Two occurred in the setting of a perforating foreign body injury (7,8). The third was thought to be related to an occult injury by the retrobulbar needle, but the authors were unable to determine during which step of the surgery did the perforation occur and could not rule out rupture of an unidentified staphyloma or spontaneous ocular explosion (9).…”
Section: Discussion/conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three other cases have been reported in the literature of the development of emphysema after PFO instillation, but none of these were thought to be directly due to a PFO-related injury. Two occurred in the setting of a perforating foreign body injury (7,8). The third was thought to be related to an occult injury by the retrobulbar needle, but the authors were unable to determine during which step of the surgery did the perforation occur and could not rule out rupture of an unidentified staphyloma or spontaneous ocular explosion (9).…”
Section: Discussion/conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%