Abstract:Postoperative tamponade with perfluoro-n-octane may decrease the rate of redetachment in giant retinal tear repair compared with silicone oil or perfluorocarbon gas alone. We found no adverse effects directly attributable to perfluoro-n-octane.
“…15,28 We observed a high rate (32%) of a characteristic inflammation compared with some previous clinical studies using postoperative PFO for RD. [22][23][24] This may be because of the longer average duration of PFO used in the present study, or underrecognition and retrospective design of previous studies. Rush et al 22 have recently observed inflammation with posterior lens capsule deposits in a comparable proportion (8/39) of eyes with postoperative PFO and reported similar resolution after PFO removal and clinical management with topical corticosteroids.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Previous reports have indicated mixed results using heavier-than-water compounds, and previous series investigating PFO 11,[22][23][24]27 have reported small samples of patients with PVR. The results of the present study indicate that a high rate of anatomical success can be achieved with short duration postoperative PFO in advanced PVR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Recently, several reports have indicated that PFO may be left in the vitreous cavity postoperatively for short durations and may be useful for inferior retinal tamponade. [22][23][24] The purpose of the present study was to describe a technique involving PPV, intermediate (2-to 3-week duration) "medium-term" postoperative PFO (MT-PFO) followed by staged PFO removal in patients presenting with inferior retina redetachment complicated by Grade C PVR.…”
Medium-term PFO was found to be an efficacious technique for operative management of recurrent inferior retinal detachments complicated by Grade C PVR. The method of primary repair (scleral buckle vs. pars plana vitrectomy) did not affect reattachment rates. Transient inflammation and intraocular pressure elevation are potential complications associated with this technique. Persistent intraocular pressure elevation was associated with worse visual outcome.
“…15,28 We observed a high rate (32%) of a characteristic inflammation compared with some previous clinical studies using postoperative PFO for RD. [22][23][24] This may be because of the longer average duration of PFO used in the present study, or underrecognition and retrospective design of previous studies. Rush et al 22 have recently observed inflammation with posterior lens capsule deposits in a comparable proportion (8/39) of eyes with postoperative PFO and reported similar resolution after PFO removal and clinical management with topical corticosteroids.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Previous reports have indicated mixed results using heavier-than-water compounds, and previous series investigating PFO 11,[22][23][24]27 have reported small samples of patients with PVR. The results of the present study indicate that a high rate of anatomical success can be achieved with short duration postoperative PFO in advanced PVR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Recently, several reports have indicated that PFO may be left in the vitreous cavity postoperatively for short durations and may be useful for inferior retinal tamponade. [22][23][24] The purpose of the present study was to describe a technique involving PPV, intermediate (2-to 3-week duration) "medium-term" postoperative PFO (MT-PFO) followed by staged PFO removal in patients presenting with inferior retina redetachment complicated by Grade C PVR.…”
Medium-term PFO was found to be an efficacious technique for operative management of recurrent inferior retinal detachments complicated by Grade C PVR. The method of primary repair (scleral buckle vs. pars plana vitrectomy) did not affect reattachment rates. Transient inflammation and intraocular pressure elevation are potential complications associated with this technique. Persistent intraocular pressure elevation was associated with worse visual outcome.
“…Thus far, postoperative perfluoro-n-octane short-term tamponade has been used mainly for retinal detachments caused by giant tears. [5][6][7] Sirimaharaj and associates 6 reported that perfluoro-n-octane was effective for short-term postoperative tamponade to manage retinal detachments resulting from giant retinal tears. They elected to leave the perfluoro-n-octane in situ for 5 to 14 days because doing so provided sufficient time for chorioretinal adhesions to develop.…”
“…Despite the aforementioned concerns about retinal toxicity, this role has been successfully extended to shortterm postoperative tamponade, with reduced re-detachment rates [35,39]. Here HSO could eventually reduce PVR rates compared to standard silicone oils; however, randomized controlled trials are required to finally solve this question.…”
Section: Heavy Silicone Oil For Various Clinical Applicationsmentioning
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.