2007
DOI: 10.1016/s0025-7753(07)72498-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perfil de riesgo cardiovascular de los pacientes con hipertensión arterial no controlada. Estudio Control-Project

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
7
0
6

Year Published

2009
2009
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
7
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…A cross-sectional Spanish study assessing cardiovascular risk and comorbidities in hypertension patients attending primary care practices found the following prevalences of BP categories among 1413 subjects: controlled 3%, mild 50%, moderate 39%, severe 8%. 13 The mean age of their sample was similar to ours at 65.3 (11.4) years. Among high-risk patients (based on comorbidities and absolute BP levels) there was no medication change in 30%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A cross-sectional Spanish study assessing cardiovascular risk and comorbidities in hypertension patients attending primary care practices found the following prevalences of BP categories among 1413 subjects: controlled 3%, mild 50%, moderate 39%, severe 8%. 13 The mean age of their sample was similar to ours at 65.3 (11.4) years. Among high-risk patients (based on comorbidities and absolute BP levels) there was no medication change in 30%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Limited cross-sectional data suggest a prevalence among those with hypertension in the 8–19% range. 10, 11, 12, 13 How long such patients are exposed to high BPs, or how they are being managed in actual practice is relatively unknown, with existing data based on small samples and select populations. 12, 13, 14 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A larger sample size could possibly have allowed the analysis of these relevant subgroups, considering the poor evaluation of cardiovascular risk and its frequent underestimation, especially in primary prevention. 26,27 The indication for AT in secondary prevention is clearer. 28 Emphasis should be given to the fact that, even assuming a minimum risk threshold, evidence now exists for the favorable effect of AT in primary prevention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The need for prompt follow-up and/or referral to a specialist, and appropriate combinations of drugs to achieve BP control (BP < 140/90 mmHg) is emphasized in guidelines [4,19]. Yet previous studies of SHT management [20-22] have provided evidence that treatment is often inadequate in relation to the serious risks faced by these patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%