2007
DOI: 10.1590/s1516-80342007000100003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perfil comunicativo de indivíduos com a síndrome de Williams-Beuren

Abstract: RESUMOObjetivo: Descrever o perfil comunicativo de indivíduos com a síndrome de Williams-Beuren. Métodos: A casuística foi composta por 12 indivíduos com a síndrome com idade cronológica entre 6;6 a 23;6 (Grupo 1) que foram comparados a outros 12 sem a síndrome e com idade mental semelhante e sem dificuldades de linguagem/aprendizagem (Grupo 2). Os indivíduos foram avaliados em situação de conversação para classificação dos comportamentos verbais e não-verbais, segundo critérios pragmáticos, levantamento do nú… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
6
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
4
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As seen, both repetitive verbal behaviours in conversationperseverative speech and echolaliawere associated with lower language scores. Repetitive verbal behaviours were previously reported in conversation and narration of WS individuals (Klein-Tasman et al 2007;Rossi et al 2007;Lincoln et al 2007;Van der Fluit et al 2012), although a more comprehensive study of associations between these and general cognitive functioning and language scores were not identified as far as we know.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As seen, both repetitive verbal behaviours in conversationperseverative speech and echolaliawere associated with lower language scores. Repetitive verbal behaviours were previously reported in conversation and narration of WS individuals (Klein-Tasman et al 2007;Rossi et al 2007;Lincoln et al 2007;Van der Fluit et al 2012), although a more comprehensive study of associations between these and general cognitive functioning and language scores were not identified as far as we know.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…It is important to make clear that despite echolalia and perseverative speech being both restrictive behaviours, they have different impacts on communication performance. Echolalia is more restrictive than the repetitive use of statements or topics in conversation, as seen in perseverative speech (Rossi et al ). In fact, language scores and Verbal IQ were lower for the echolalic group, but curiously, these were not associated with any behavioural problems, contrary to what was seen for perseverative speech (which was associated with greater Thought Problems symptoms).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estudos sobre fenótipo cognitivo, comportamental, social e de linguagem em pessoas com a síndrome descrevem padrões consistentes de deficiência intelectual em níveis variados, comportamentos elevados de sociabilidade e empatia, bom desempenho em tarefas que demandam uso de linguagem expressiva, prejuízos em habilidades de linguagem receptiva (Rossi, Moretti-Ferreira, & Giacheti, 2007;Tassabehji & Donnai, 2006), hiperacusia, comportamentos estereotipados, agressividade, comorbidades psiquiátricas como fobias específicas, transtorno de ansiedade generalizada, transtorno de déficit de atenção e hiperatividade (Gothelf, Farber, Raveh, Apter, & Attias, 2006;Levitin, Cole, Lincoln, & Bellugi, 2005;Leyfer, Woodruff-Borden, & Mervis, 2009;Meyer-Lindenberg e cols., 2005;Nunes, 2010;Pober, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Behaviorally, WBS subjects have a hyper sociability, empathy in social relationships, a generalized anxiety disorder, phobias (Klein-Tasman & Mervis, 2003). A cognitive and behavioral phenotype of WBS is characterized by presenting a varying degree of intellectual disability, deficits in visuo-spatial skills and executive functions (working memory and planning), specific language skills and better performance in expressive language than in the receptive language (Farran & Jarrold, 2003;Martens, Wilson & Reutens, 2008;Moretti-Ferreira & Giacheti, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%