2008
DOI: 10.4310/pamq.2008.v4.n4.a3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perfecting the Nearly Perfect

Abstract: We introduce a natural variant of the notion of nearly perfect complex. We show that this variant gives rise to canonical perfect complexes and prove several useful properties of this construction (including additivity of the associated Euler characteristics on suitable exact triangles). We then apply this approach to complexes arising from theétale cohomology of G m on arithmetic surfaces and discuss links to Lichtenbaum's theory of Weil-étale cohomology.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the result of Corollary 1.8 is much stronger than (3) in that it shows the explicit structure of A(K) χ as a Galois module to be completely determined (conjecturally at least) by Stickelberger elements via the obvious (non-canonical…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, the result of Corollary 1.8 is much stronger than (3) in that it shows the explicit structure of A(K) χ as a Galois module to be completely determined (conjecturally at least) by Stickelberger elements via the obvious (non-canonical…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In this case there has as yet been no construction of a 'Weil-étale topology' for Y S := Spec(O K,S ) with all of the properties that are conjectured by Lichtenbaum in [34]. However, if Y S is a compactification of Y S and φ is the natural inclusion Y S ⊂ Y S , then the approach of [3] can be used to show that, should such a topology exist with all of the expected properties, then the groups H i c ((O K,S ) W , Z) defined above would be canonically isomorphic to the group [3,Rem. 3.8] and hence by the duality theorem in Weil-étale cohomology for curves over finite fields that is proved by Lichtenbaum in [33].…”
Section: Proposition 24 There Exist Canonical Complexes Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this case there has as yet been no construction of a 'Weil-étale topology' for Y S := Spec(O K,S ) with all of the properties that are conjectured by Lichtenbaum in [34]. However, if Y S is a compactification of Y S and φ is the natural inclusion Y S ⊂ Y S , then the approach of [4] can be used to show that, should such a topology exist with all of the expected properties, then the groups H i c ((O K,S ) W , Z) defined above would be canonically isomorphic to the group [34]. (iii) The definition of RΓ T ((O K,S ) W , G m ) as the (shifted) linear dual of the complex RΓ c,T ((O K,S ) W , Z) is motivated by [4,Rem.…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where α X is constructed out of étale duality. Here the scheme X is of pure dimension d. This idea was suggested by works of Burns [8], Geisser [18] and the author [38]. The techniques involved in this paper rely on results due to Geisser and Levine on Bloch's cycle complex (see [17], [20], [21], [22] and [32]).…”
Section: R)mentioning
confidence: 99%