1982
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.48.1769
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perfect Screening for Charged Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The agreement for βe 2 σ up to 16 is quite good, and much better than the HNC theory [26] which does not easily converge or the INV-C of Duh and Haymet [25] which is shown in figure 1. However, in our theory the error in the last point is sizable, and we have no explanation for this at the time, other than the suspicion that this may be a consequence of the failure to satisfy the PST [23].…”
Section: The Contact Pair Distribution Functionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The agreement for βe 2 σ up to 16 is quite good, and much better than the HNC theory [26] which does not easily converge or the INV-C of Duh and Haymet [25] which is shown in figure 1. However, in our theory the error in the last point is sizable, and we have no explanation for this at the time, other than the suspicion that this may be a consequence of the failure to satisfy the PST [23].…”
Section: The Contact Pair Distribution Functionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Otherwise the partition function, and therefore all the thermodynamic functions, will be a͒ divergent. 9 The size of the region where this charge shielding occurs depends not only on the electrostatics, but also on all the other interactions of the system. For spherical ions this means:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The solution of Eq. (23) is readily obtained from the 2D Coulomb Green's function (27) Using this we obtain (28) where (29) While the above results are valid for arbitrary form factors it is convenient for the moment to consider the limit of point charges (30) although one has to be careful with questions of the self-adjointness of H in this limit. 21 ) Equation (28) then becomes (31) where (32) The ground state of H+ may now be written We see from Eq.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%