2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.aim.2013.06.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perfect forms, K-theory and the cohomology of modular groups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We expect that there should be a close relation between the cohomology of Out F n and that of GL(n, Z). For example, Elbaz-Vincent, Gangl and Soulé [15] recently calculated the rational cohomology of GL(n, Z) for n = 5, 6, 7 and it will be a very interesting problem to compare these results with the known results about H * (Out F 6 ; Q). Also we have a conjectural geometric meaning of the classes µ k ∈ H 4k (Out F 2k+2 ; Q).…”
Section: The Case Of H G1 and The Outer Automorphism Groups Of Free mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We expect that there should be a close relation between the cohomology of Out F n and that of GL(n, Z). For example, Elbaz-Vincent, Gangl and Soulé [15] recently calculated the rational cohomology of GL(n, Z) for n = 5, 6, 7 and it will be a very interesting problem to compare these results with the known results about H * (Out F 6 ; Q). Also we have a conjectural geometric meaning of the classes µ k ∈ H 4k (Out F 2k+2 ; Q).…”
Section: The Case Of H G1 and The Outer Automorphism Groups Of Free mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enumeration of the case d = r for d ≤ 8, respectively d = 9, is done in [Mar01], respectively [KMS12]. Enumeration of cases d ≤ 6, respectively d = 7, is done in [EVGS02], respectively [EVGS13]. The cases (r, d) = (8, 9), (8, 10), (9, 10) are treated in [DSHS15].…”
Section: Appendix Computations By Mathieu Dutour Sikirićmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Section 4 we describe a "mass formula" for the cells in our tessellations that provides a strong computational check on the correctness of our constructions. In Section 5 we give an explicit representative for the nontrivial class in the top cohomological degree; this construction is motivated by a similar construction in [14,13]. Finally, in Section 6 we give the results of our computations.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that there should be a canonical generator for this homology group, a fact already explored in [14,Section 5]. An obvious choice is the analogue of the chain presented there, namely…”
Section: Explicit Homology Classesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation