2018
DOI: 10.1097/bot.0000000000001236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Percutaneous Versus Open Treatment of Posterior Pelvic Ring Injuries: Changes in Practice Patterns Over Time

Abstract: Early-career orthopaedic surgeons are performing more percutaneous fixation of the posterior pelvic ring and less open surgery. The impact of this change in volume on surgeon proficiency is unknown and warrants additional research.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Triangular osteosynthesis also allows for percutaneous application, a technique that has become increasingly common among trauma surgeons. Both open and percutaneous techniques were shown to produce similar, good, or excellent reductions [ 8 ]. Limitations to percutaneous fixation include: inadequate percutaneous reduction of sacroiliac joints, associated acetabular fracture necessitating open reduction, poor intraoperative imaging such as abundant bowel gas or intra-abdominal contrast agents, sacral dysmorphism preventing safe passage of percutaneous screws, and the presence of neurologic injuries where decompression is indicated [ 6 , 8 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Triangular osteosynthesis also allows for percutaneous application, a technique that has become increasingly common among trauma surgeons. Both open and percutaneous techniques were shown to produce similar, good, or excellent reductions [ 8 ]. Limitations to percutaneous fixation include: inadequate percutaneous reduction of sacroiliac joints, associated acetabular fracture necessitating open reduction, poor intraoperative imaging such as abundant bowel gas or intra-abdominal contrast agents, sacral dysmorphism preventing safe passage of percutaneous screws, and the presence of neurologic injuries where decompression is indicated [ 6 , 8 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The treatment method is an important factor that can influence the functional outcomes [1]. Optimal treatment for unstable fractures of the pelvis is not yet defined [13]. The ORIF technique includes anterior and posterior approaches.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Pfannenstiel and ilioinguinal approaches may injure the bladder, spermatic cord, iliac vessels, and the femoral and lateral thigh nerves; and/or trigger herniation [ 9 ]. Developments in percutaneous screws since the 1990s have reduced intraoperative comorbidities, blood loss, operative time, negative post-operative outcomes, decubitus complications, and the infection rate; and facilitate early mobilization [ 10 , 11 ]. However, percutaneous screwing remains somewhat risky and technically challenging [ 2 , 12 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%