2001
DOI: 10.1097/00005373-200112000-00006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Percutaneous Treatment of Secondary Abdominal Compartment Syndrome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
48
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
48
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[164][165][166] This approach has been supported in one human study of the continuous negative extra-abdominal pressure (NEXAP) device 167 where previous animal studies have shown no reduction in IAP for IAH cases but where there has been an IAP reduction when its commencement value was normal. 168 The effects on respiratory dynamics of the NEXAP device are complicated and partially counterproductive.…”
Section: Medical Managementmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…[164][165][166] This approach has been supported in one human study of the continuous negative extra-abdominal pressure (NEXAP) device 167 where previous animal studies have shown no reduction in IAP for IAH cases but where there has been an IAP reduction when its commencement value was normal. 168 The effects on respiratory dynamics of the NEXAP device are complicated and partially counterproductive.…”
Section: Medical Managementmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Judicious use of fluids and avoidance of fluid over-resuscitation is the key element in the prevention of secondary ACS [16]. Percutaneous drainage of abdominal fluid collection may reduce IAP, particularly in the burn patient [17,18]. Moreover, the choice of resuscitation fluid among critically ill patients with burns may have a clinical importance.…”
Section: Prevention and Diagnosis Of Iah And Acs In Burn Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Temporary abdominal closure must be changed regularly with the aim of earliest possible closure (Figures 3a-e). Recent publications on aggressive open abdomen management report over 80% primary fascial closure rate with a very low complication (fistula, infection, and abscess) rate [40,44].…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Percutaneous drainage of the peritoneal fluid is an attractive option and well documented in the burn and pediatric literature [44][45][46]. First, this method is very unlikely to be efficient in acute damage control patients where ACS is caused by intestinal edema, spaceoccupying packs and clotted blood, rather than drainable free peritoneal fluid.…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%