1990
DOI: 10.1177/030006059001800505
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Percutaneous Treatment of Acute Soft Tissue Lesions with Naproxen Gel and Ketoprofen Gel

Abstract: A randomized independent-group, single-blind study was performed to compare the analgesic efficacy and the local and cosmetic tolerability of 3-5 cm of 10% naproxen gel with 10% ketoprofen gel in 30 patients complaining of moderate or severe pain due to acute soft tissue lesions. Both drugs were administered topically and were applied to the painful area at least once every 12 h as required. Naproxen gel was effective, cosmetically acceptable and safe in the treatment of acute soft tissue lesions. Efficacy and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 Therefore, percutaneous administration of NSAIDs, like ketoprofen and naproxen, has been studied to minimize GI side-effects and other possible systemic side-effects due to high plasma peak levels after oral administration. [2][3][4] Recent studies have shown that GI sideeffects of NSAIDs are, at least partly, due to inhibition of the COX-1 enzyme, and thus it may not be possible to eliminate GI side-effects of NSAIDs by percutaneous administration. 5 However, a topically administered drug would be more suitable for treatment of local inflammatory and pain processes because of higher local drug concentration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Therefore, percutaneous administration of NSAIDs, like ketoprofen and naproxen, has been studied to minimize GI side-effects and other possible systemic side-effects due to high plasma peak levels after oral administration. [2][3][4] Recent studies have shown that GI sideeffects of NSAIDs are, at least partly, due to inhibition of the COX-1 enzyme, and thus it may not be possible to eliminate GI side-effects of NSAIDs by percutaneous administration. 5 However, a topically administered drug would be more suitable for treatment of local inflammatory and pain processes because of higher local drug concentration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detailed information can be found in the Supplemental Table (available online at http:// www.mayoclinicproceedings.org). The most commonly studied agents were NSAIDs (n¼26), [30][31][32]37,39,51,52,54,58,61,64,71,72,74,78,[80][81][82][84][85][86][87][88][89][90][91] followed by lidocaine (n¼9), 33,36,[40][41][42][43]55,65,83 capsaicin (n¼6), 29,35,38,53,73,75 and amitriptyline (n¼5). 45,47,59,67,68 Other agents studied included glyceryl trinitrate (n¼3), 44,48,69 opioids (n¼2), 50,60 menthol (n¼2), ...…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…45,47,59,67,68 Other agents studied included glyceryl trinitrate (n¼3), 44,48,69 opioids (n¼2), 50,60 menthol (n¼2), 62,92 pimecrolimus (n¼2), 28,49 and phenytoin (n¼2). 66,70 The most common indications were soft tissue injuries and related conditions (n¼17), 30,32,37,48,50,54,57,63,66,71,74,81,85,86,[89][90][91] followed by neuropathic pain (n¼17), 29,34,36,38,[40][41][42][43]47,59,65,67,72,73,78,82,87 experimental pain (n¼6), 45,53,56,64,…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the general acceptance of topical NSAIDs as a viable treatment option is relatively recent in the United States, they have been available in Europe for many years. 85,86 Worldwide, at least 15 topical NSAIDs have been available since 1999. 87 Factors that have likely limited their use in the United States include their availability only through compounding pharmacies and the general lack of coverage through traditional prescription medication plans.…”
Section: Topical Nsaidsmentioning
confidence: 99%