2005
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-004-2611-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Percutaneous treatment in patients presenting with malignant cardiac tamponade

Abstract: The percutaneous treatment of pericardial effusion resulting in cardiac tamponade has undergone an evolution in recent years with the use of less invasive drainage techniques in selected cases. To determine optimal therapy modalities for oncology patients with malignant pericardial tamponade (MPT), the authors review their institutional experience with percutaneous needle puncture routes, means of imaging-guided drainage and percutaneous management of the pericardial fluid effusion (pericardial sclerosis and b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(45 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This intervention is tolerated with low morbidity and mortality also by patients with a poor performance status [14]. To achieve complete apposition of the parietal and visceral pericardium, an indwelling pericardial catheter can also be inserted for several days for extended drainage [15]. The efficacy of the insertion of these indwelling pericardial catheters has already been documented by Kopecky et al [16] in 1986 and was confirmed by following studies [14].…”
Section: Pericardial Effusionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…This intervention is tolerated with low morbidity and mortality also by patients with a poor performance status [14]. To achieve complete apposition of the parietal and visceral pericardium, an indwelling pericardial catheter can also be inserted for several days for extended drainage [15]. The efficacy of the insertion of these indwelling pericardial catheters has already been documented by Kopecky et al [16] in 1986 and was confirmed by following studies [14].…”
Section: Pericardial Effusionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…To the best of our knowledge, the comparison of these three procedures has not been reported in a single study before, especially among patients with NSCLC. 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 Labbe et al. 27 retrospectively compared pericardiotomy and pericardiocentesis, and a higher recurrence rate was noted in the pericardiocentesis group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intervention procedures are crucial steps for preventing death due to pericardial tamponade, and different procedures show varying success rates, safety, and pericardial effusion recurrence rates. 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 Nowadays, simple pericardiocentesis, balloon pericardiotomy, or surgical pericardiectomy are often carried out on patients harboring symptomatic pericardial effusion. Pericardiocentesis is often carried out by pigtail insertion to the pericardial space, and it can be echo-guided, computed tomography-guided, or fluoroscopy-guided.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[12] Though the procedure was simple and effective, it is commonly associated with shunt thrombosis and recurrence of effusion. [1213] Olson et al .,[14] in their 11 years of experience with 33 patients, the surgical pericardioperitoneal window reported no mortality directly related to the pericardial effusion or the procedure. None of their patients developed peritoneal carcinomatosis or diaphragmatic hernia and only one patient developed recurrent pericardial effusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%