Percutaneous retrograde intubation

Circumstances and Outcomes of a Firearm Seizure Law: Marion County, Indiana, 2006–2013

“…So, what do these results contribute to the national debate about gun violence? The right of an individual to own firearms is protected by the United States Constitution, as interpreted by the U.S. Supreme Court (District of Columbia v. Heller, 2008). Federal background checks have focused on preventing "prohibited persons," including felons and people with a history of civil commitment, from legally purchasing handguns, but it is clear that background checks do not prevent people from illegally purchasing weapons, which are widely available in the United States.…”

Second Amendment Sanctuaries

“…208 This normative tailoring of rights exists in Second Amendment doctrine as well, where certain restrictions on gun possession in "sensitive places" have been deemed "presumptively lawful." 209 The historical-categorical approach adopted by Justice Scalia in Heller provides further support for constitutional localism in Second Amendment doctrine, though lower federal courts have since opted overwhelmingly for the more familiar balancing test articulated in Justice Breyer's dissent. 210 Under the historical-categorical approach, "the fact that the United States has a deeply rooted tradition of comparatively stringent urban gun control is an argument for treating contemporary urban gun control as, if not 'presumptively lawful,' at least meriting special deference."…”

Judicial Toleration for Negative Externalities of Bearing Arms in Public

“…173 In Moore, laws prevent dangerous people from having handguns whereas in Kachalsky laws prevent law-abiding citizens from having handguns without a justified need. 174 Moore declares that if there is to be a balancing test, even if Heller says it is improper to make one, 175 then the test should consist of measuring how public safety is balanced by responsible persons bearing arms in public. 176 In 2017, the District of Columbia Circuit Court became the last circuit court to touch on the 'bearing arms in public' debate and zealously followed Heller.…”

“…191 Second, the government retains the burden to prove whether it has the authority to infringe upon an individual's constitutional right to bear arms. 192 At a very basic level, the Second Amendment declares that the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed by Congress. 193 Also in its basic form, the Fourteenth Amendment declares that no state 194 shall deprive any person of liberty without due process of law.…”

“…226 Therefore, an interestbalancing approach that weighs public safety against self-defense of a responsible, law-abiding individual has already been done and should not be done "anew." 227 V. JUDICIAL TOLERATION OF THE NEGATIVE EXTERNALITIES still occurred. 230 Mistakes will be made by law-abiding citizens and that actuality does not diminish the fact that the Second Amendment right to bear arms does not depend on "casualty counts."…”