2019
DOI: 10.21037/jgo.2019.01.34
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Percutaneous radiofrequency versus microwave ablation for management of hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomized controlled trial

Abstract: Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer in the world and the third most common cause of cancer related deaths. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA) are effective measures for HCC management. Although MWA is usually considered to be superior to RFA in the medical community, clinical studies showed contradictory results. We aimed to compare the efficacy of both techniques using a randomized controlled trial. Methods: We had assessed all patients with defin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
78
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
78
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In accordance with inclusion and exclusion criteria, 26 studies with 4396 patients were finally enrolled. [ 25 27 , 11 , 28 , 13 , 29 36 , 14 , 37 43 , 12 , 44 46 ] The flowchart is shown in Fig. 1 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In accordance with inclusion and exclusion criteria, 26 studies with 4396 patients were finally enrolled. [ 25 27 , 11 , 28 , 13 , 29 36 , 14 , 37 43 , 12 , 44 46 ] The flowchart is shown in Fig. 1 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Registering the pre-and post-ablation images has been a promising alternative to conventional side-by-side assessment for AMs, which has many advantages as follows (21)(22)(23): (1) faster and more accurate measurement of safety boundaries and (2) clearer observation of the spatial relationship between the tumor and ablation zone. Therefore, an increasing number of registration methods have emerged for evaluating AMs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microwaves have a higher thermal e ciency than radiofrequency ablation [11] .This is mainly due to the different ways in which microwaves and radiofrequencies interact with tissues. The heat-generating component of radiofrequency ablation is mainly located within a few millimeters around the electrode and is susceptible to tissue carbonization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%