Introduction: Intradiscal biacuplasty is an innovative treatment for lumbar discogenic pain. Two electrodes, inserted into the posterolateral corners of the disc, produce a three-dimensional heat lesion across the posterior anulus, which purportedly seals radial and circumferential fissures, and coagulates nerve endings throughout the posterior anulus. Methods: As part of a multi-centre study, a prospective audit of outcomes was undertaken in 14 patients with chronic low back pain due to internal disc disruption. All patients completed clinical assessments before treatment and at one, two, three, six, and 12 months after treatment, using a visual analogue scale for pain, and the SF36 for disability and function. Results: At inception, the median scores (interquartile range) for the sample were 65 (45-75) for pain, 30 (24-51) for physical functioning, and 50 (25-50) for social functioning. The treatment was easy to execute. Heating the disc was totally painless. No patient suffered any complications or side-effects. After treatment, seven patients reported no benefit; three had benefit at one month, but their pain scores deteriorated by three or six months. Four patients (28%) reported benefit, with reduction in pain by 60% in two, 80% in one, and 100% in the fourth, sustained for 12 months, corroborated by improvements in physical and activities of daily living, and reduction of medication to occasional simple analgesics. Discussion: Although biacuplasty has only a limited success rate, the one in four patients who benefitted were very satisfied with their outcomes. To distinguish the small success rate from a placebo effect would require a very large trial. Remarkable is how simple and innocuous the treatment is. Improvements in the technology of the procedure, such as curved electrodes and better temperature settings, might provide better coverage of the painful segment of the target disc, and thereby increase the success rate. Background: A self-reported questionnaire that simultaneously measures domains of pain and disability, is reliable, valid, responsive, quick to administer and easy to understand would be a useful spine care tool. Purpose: To evaluate the reliability, validity, responsiveness and ease-of-use of a short composite low back paindisability questionnaire (PDQ-S). Method: 73 subjects undergoing spinal intervention procedures (injection or neurotomy) completed 3 questionnaires: McGill pain, Oswestry disability and PDQ-S twice prior to their procedure (1 month apart) and once following (2 weeks post injection; 6-8 weeks post neurotomy). The PDQ-S is a 4 question (pain intensity and frequency; 2 patient specific disabilities) VAS scored questionnaire. Analysis: a. Test-retest reliability: repeated measures ANOVA and Pearson's correlation coefficient; b. Validity: Pearson's correlation of the pain question scores of the PDQ-S with the McGill, and the disability questions scores of the PDQ-S with the Oswestry; c. Responsiveness: Responsiveness Index (RI) scores; d. Practicality: average time to comp...