1993
DOI: 10.1016/s1051-0443(93)71930-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Percutaneous Palliation of Malignant Obstructive Jaundice with the Wallstent Endoprosthesis: Follow-up and Reintervention in Patients with Hilar and Non-Hilar Obstruction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
41
0
3

Year Published

2000
2000
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
41
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A RCT comparing unilateral versus bilateral drainage in patients with malignant hilar obstruction found that drainage of one functional hepatic lobe is sufficient to relieve obstruction with no difference in complication and survival rates [258] . It is important to note that stents placed for hilar lesions will require re-intervention in about 30% of patients due to stent occlusion [259,260] . A RCT comparing covered to uncovered stents in patients with unresectable distal biliary malignancies showed that the patency of covered stents was significantly higher than that of uncovered stents [261] .…”
Section: Biliary Endoprosthesis (Stenting)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A RCT comparing unilateral versus bilateral drainage in patients with malignant hilar obstruction found that drainage of one functional hepatic lobe is sufficient to relieve obstruction with no difference in complication and survival rates [258] . It is important to note that stents placed for hilar lesions will require re-intervention in about 30% of patients due to stent occlusion [259,260] . A RCT comparing covered to uncovered stents in patients with unresectable distal biliary malignancies showed that the patency of covered stents was significantly higher than that of uncovered stents [261] .…”
Section: Biliary Endoprosthesis (Stenting)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Distant metastases (mainly in the liver) [19, 72], size of primary tumor [72], laboratory findings [17, 59, 64, 86], pain [59] or a combination of those factors [79]. Some malignancies causing hilar obstruction have [58, 62, 63] or have not [57, 65] been found to be associated with a significantly poorer prognosis. Thus, endoscopic palliation of MDO compared to MHO has [58, 62, 63] or has not [57, 65] been found to significantly prolong survival.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some malignancies causing hilar obstruction have [58, 62, 63] or have not [57, 65] been found to be associated with a significantly poorer prognosis. Thus, endoscopic palliation of MDO compared to MHO has [58, 62, 63] or has not [57, 65] been found to significantly prolong survival. Similarly, age at diagnosis has [16] or has not [65] been found to predict survival.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a in larger patient population, furthermore, the question of whether they are related to the procedure or are due to other factors present in the patient population may be solved. Becker et al (18) and Gilliams et al (19) reported that in patients with hilar obstruction, the period of stent patency was shorter than in patients with non-hilar obstruction, but survival time was similar. However, after placing two stents (in a Y-configuration) in patients with hilar obstruction through both transhepatic tracts and then treating them with intraluminal brachytherapy, the mean duration of stent patency (8.3 months) was not different from that in all patients who underwent intraluminal brachytherapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%