2020
DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jeaa083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Percutaneous or surgical revascularization is associated with survival benefit in stable coronary artery disease

Abstract: Aims  We assessed the association between early invasive therapy, burden of ischaemia, and survival benefit separately for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Ischaemia involving more than 10% of the left ventricular myocardium may identify patients who benefit from revascularization. However, it is not clear whether this association exists with both PCI and CABG. Materials and results … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
16
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This notion may also explain our possibly conflicting report in which we demonstrate a survival benefit for PCI in a retrospective propensity-matched comparison with medical therapy once the amount of single photon emission computed tomography detected ischemia exceeded 15%. 32 This study is currently the only report demonstrating a survival impact for isolated PCI (not mixed with CABG) in chronic coronary syndromes. However, we were not able to provide information on CAD severity and the incidence of myocardial infarctions.…”
Section: Better Stents Will Probably Not Lead To Better Survivalmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…This notion may also explain our possibly conflicting report in which we demonstrate a survival benefit for PCI in a retrospective propensity-matched comparison with medical therapy once the amount of single photon emission computed tomography detected ischemia exceeded 15%. 32 This study is currently the only report demonstrating a survival impact for isolated PCI (not mixed with CABG) in chronic coronary syndromes. However, we were not able to provide information on CAD severity and the incidence of myocardial infarctions.…”
Section: Better Stents Will Probably Not Lead To Better Survivalmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…SPECT-MPI was performed in two affiliated nuclear testing laboratories and the population included both outpatients and inpatients with suspected or known CAD. Patients who underwent early revascularization (revascularization within 90 days of SPECT MPI) were excluded (n = 304) because SPECT MPI results may influence the decision to pursue revascularization [1] , which may alter long-term outcomes [19] , [20] . The study was approved by University of Calgary Research Ethics Board (REB-ID ASD-7564), including waiver of consent.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to current clinical guidelines, revascularization should be indicated in patients with an ischemic burden > 10% of the LV (3). In a recent large observational study, the association between early PCI or CABG (performed <90 days from the first evaluation), the ischemic burden and all-cause mortality has been investigated in a large population of patients who underwent single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging (19). At survival analysis, when patients were stratified according to the extent of ischemia, coronary revascularization (either with PCI or CABG) was associated with decreased mortality in patients with ischemia involving >15% of the myocardium.…”
Section: Coronary Revascularization Of Obstructive Cad: Is That Still the Major Goal?mentioning
confidence: 99%