Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with scoliosis: our institutional experience

Chen, He Qun; Qi, Lin; Li, Yuan

doi:10.1007/s00240-012-0529-4

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This procedure was performed as previously described (12). Patients were placed in the lithotomy position, and a 5F ureteral catheter was inserted into the ipsilateral ureter.…”

Section: Mpcnlmentioning

confidence: 99%

Suctioning semirigid ureteroscopic lithotomy versus minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy for large upper ureteral stones: a retrospective study

Chen¹,

Zhu²,

Li³

et al. 2021

Transl Androl Urol

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: To compare the safety and validity of a suctioning semirigid ureteroscopic lithotomy (Sotn-URSL) and minimally percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mPCNL) in treating upper ureteral stone larger than 15 mm. Methods: Between February 2018 and December 2019, 97 patients who had upper ureteral stone >15 mm were consecutively included in this study. Forty-six patients underwent Sotn-URSL and 51 underwent mPCNL by the same surgeon. The following parameters were retrospectively assessed: patient and stone characteristics, surgical details, perioperative outcomes, and stone-free rates (SFRs).Results: No significant difference was observed in two groups for patient and stone characteristics, except that mPCNL group had a higher incidence of severe hydronephrosis (19.6% vs. 41.2%, P=0.021). Sotn-URSL group was similar to mPCNL group in terms of the mean duration of surgery (50.5±5.9 vs. 52.9± 8.0 min, P=0.106) and the SFR after 1 month (91.3% vs. 98%, P=0.187). The hospital stay after surgery of Sotn-URSL group was significant shorter than mPCNL group (1.4±0.6 vs. 2.3±0.7 days, P<0.001), and postoperative complications in Sotn-URSL group was less, especially postoperative pain (P=0.044).Conclusions: Both mPCNL and Sotn-URSL are suitable for upper ureteral stones with a diameter of >15 mm. Nevertheless, further well-designed studies with long-term follow-up are needed to confirmed the results.

show abstract

“…This procedure was performed as previously described (12). Patients were placed in the lithotomy position, and a 5F ureteral catheter was inserted into the ipsilateral ureter.…”

Section: Mpcnlmentioning

confidence: 99%

Suctioning semirigid ureteroscopic lithotomy versus minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy for large upper ureteral stones: a retrospective study

Chen¹,

Zhu²,

Li³

et al. 2021

Transl Androl Urol

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Predictors of clinical outcome after minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal calculus

Deng

Chong

et al. 2015

Urolithiasis

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To investigate all the predictors of operative duration, hospital stay and stone-free rate post-minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL) and to establish a logistic regression formula to predict the probability of stone-free post-MPCNL. From August 2009 to August 2012, 396 patients were enrolled in the present study. The patients' characteristics, history, laboratory examination and imaging information were used as independent variables, and operative duration, hospital stay, residuals (≥4 mm) as outcomes. Univariate and multiple regression analysis were performed to determine independent variables. According to the result of multiple logistic regression analysis, a logistic regression formula was established to predict the stone-free probability post-MPCNL. The predictors of operative duration were type of stones and stone burden. Factors affecting hospital stay included leucocytes, stone burden, type of stones and hemoglobin. Residuals were significantly related with stone burden and type of stones. With the above results, we developed a logistic regression formula, which can effectively predict the probability of stone-free with 91.7% of sensitivity, 70.4% of specificity and 85.9% of overall accuracy.

show abstract

Comparative study of the treatment of 20–30 mm renal stones with miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureterorenoscopy in obese patients

Chen

et al. 2018

World J Urol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with scoliosis: our institutional experience

Cited by 4 publications

References 13 publications

Suctioning semirigid ureteroscopic lithotomy versus minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy for large upper ureteral stones: a retrospective study

Suctioning semirigid ureteroscopic lithotomy versus minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy for large upper ureteral stones: a retrospective study

Predictors of clinical outcome after minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal calculus

Comparative study of the treatment of 20–30 mm renal stones with miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureterorenoscopy in obese patients

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About