1981
DOI: 10.1016/s0387-7604(81)80050-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Percutaneous needle muscle biopsy in the diagnosis of neuromuscular disorders in children. Histological, histochemical and electron microscopic studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The biopsy itself took between 2 and 3 s to perform and resulted in minimal discomfort. In over 200 previously studied patients there have been minimal or no complications [22][23][24]. There were no complications from the biopsy proce dure itself in any of our CFS patients or controls.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The biopsy itself took between 2 and 3 s to perform and resulted in minimal discomfort. In over 200 previously studied patients there have been minimal or no complications [22][23][24]. There were no complications from the biopsy proce dure itself in any of our CFS patients or controls.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…21], and in the work of Behan et al [8][9][10][11] the EM specimens were of this size. The Tru-Cut needle has been used in previous investigations and has given tissue samples with excellent histologic and ultrastructural qualities [22][23][24], After the procedure, pressure was placed on the site and after several minutes a band-aid was applied. As reported in many pre vious studies, the needle muscle biopsies were very' well tolerated by all of our CFS patients and controls.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Potential limitations include the small sample size, which may prevent determination of a focal disorder, interfere with quantification of fiber types, or provide insufficient material for metabolic studies. [16][17][18][19] Good correlation of results is seen in comparisons between NMB and open biopsy performed in the same setting at the same incision site. 17,19 NMB has been shown to yield a definitive diagnosis in patients with a prior open muscle biopsy.…”
Section: -14mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…[16][17][18][19] Good correlation of results is seen in comparisons between NMB and open biopsy performed in the same setting at the same incision site. 17,19 NMB has been shown to yield a definitive diagnosis in patients with a prior open muscle biopsy. 17 Postulated reasons for repeat NMB include insufficient material, clinical suspicion of disease in setting of non-diagnostic biopsy, or need for additional material for mitochondrial DNA screening.…”
Section: -14mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Other authors have reported that percutaneous biopsies produce samples of comparable quality to open biopsies, are less traumatic and require few resources 4,[7][8][9] . When performed by someone familiar with the technique, the volume of muscle obtained is rarely insufficient for microscopic analysis 4,9,10 with no compromise of histological or histochemical features 11,12 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%