2019
DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20180965
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Percutaneous MR-guided whole-gland prostate cancer cryoablation: safety considerations and oncologic results in 30 consecutive patients

Abstract: Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common malignant tumor in males, accounting for almost 1 in 5 new cancer diagnoses in the USA. 1 Despite recent reductions in age-standardized mortality, PCa remains the third most common cause of cancer-related mortality in males. 1,2 Standard curative treatment for prostate-confined disease includes radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy. 3 According to 2017 American Urological Association guidelines, whole-gland cryoablation (CA) is a third intention alternative curative th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of this study have been recently expanded by De Marini et al who investigated the safety and the oncologic results at mid-/long-term in a population of 30 consecutive patients (18 primary treatments; 12 salvage treatments) including the first 11 patients previously reported. 49 In this larger experience, the overall local progression-free survival (LPFS) in the whole population was 92.0%, 75.7% and 69.4% at 1-, 3- and 5 year follow-up, respectively. When stratified by treatment type, 1-, 3- and 5 year LPFS was 88.9%, 75.2%, and 67.7% in the primary treatment group and 100%, 75.0% and 75.0% in the salvage treatment group, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The results of this study have been recently expanded by De Marini et al who investigated the safety and the oncologic results at mid-/long-term in a population of 30 consecutive patients (18 primary treatments; 12 salvage treatments) including the first 11 patients previously reported. 49 In this larger experience, the overall local progression-free survival (LPFS) in the whole population was 92.0%, 75.7% and 69.4% at 1-, 3- and 5 year follow-up, respectively. When stratified by treatment type, 1-, 3- and 5 year LPFS was 88.9%, 75.2%, and 67.7% in the primary treatment group and 100%, 75.0% and 75.0% in the salvage treatment group, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Under the MR imaging system, cryoprobes can be placed in solid tumors and lesions ablated by using real-time monitoring 147 . Like other noninvasive imaging modalities, MRI can be used to guide cryoablation in many tumor types, such as prostate cancer 148 , hepatic cancer 149 , and breast cancer 150 . One study took advantage of MRI sensitivity to water by adding saline to displace rectal wall from prostate during MRI-guided cryoablation of prostate cancer, which produced clear margin around the rectal wall, preventing intrusion of ice ball formation into the rectum 125 .…”
Section: Image-guided Cryoablation Cancer Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Together with multiplanar and high-resolution MR imaging, it offers precise tumor localization, multiplanar needle guidance, and precise monitoring of the ice ball. 11 However, the need for a calibration curve with the associated MR parameters is a limiting factor, as patient-specific parameters may be required. Furthermore, motion artifacts (breathing artifacts) can influence the accuracy of thermometry, since the recording time of a UTE sequence is about 1 min.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Magnetic resonance thermometry thus shows great potential for monitoring cryoablation in clinical application without the need of positioning additional temperature probes in the organ. Together with multiplanar and high‐resolution MR imaging, it offers precise tumor localization, multiplanar needle guidance, and precise monitoring of the ice ball 11 . However, the need for a calibration curve with the associated MR parameters is a limiting factor, as patient‐specific parameters may be required.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation