1992
DOI: 10.1016/0002-8703(92)90680-t
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Percutaneous mitral valvotomy by inoue catheter in young patients with mitral stenosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The incidence of mitral regurgitation was similar to previous reports in adults [1,[13][14][15] as well as in juvenile MS [3,6,7,16]. Two children (4.4%) required mitral valve replacement.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The incidence of mitral regurgitation was similar to previous reports in adults [1,[13][14][15] as well as in juvenile MS [3,6,7,16]. Two children (4.4%) required mitral valve replacement.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Rheumatic mitral stenosis in the developing countries often afflicts the younger patients (juvenile mitral stenosis) and is more severe [5]. However, the reports of PTMC in juvenile mitral stenosis mostly pertains to the adolescent patients [6,7]. Accordingly, we report our experience of PTMC in children less than 12 years of age using Inoue balloon.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…As in previous studies [6,7,9,10,19,, the present study also has shown that hemodynamic results of PTMC are related to the morphology of the diseased mitral valve. In group 1 patients with pliable noncalcified valves, optimal hemodynamic results were comparable to other series of similar valve morphology [10,11,17,26,34,35,39]. The hemodynamic benefit was mirrored in an immediate clinical improvement.…”
Section: Hemodynamic and Clinical Outcomessupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Despite this crucial relationship between appropriate balloon sizing and a successful uncomplicated PTMC outcome, there is still a lack of consensus in selecting the appropriate balloon size irrespective of technique. This has resulted in elaborate or empirical balloon sizing formulae for either single-balloon [ 10, 17,23,24,26,31,32,44] or double-balloon techniques [5,7,11,15], using the mitral annulus diameter [44], body surface area [23,3 1,321, weight [lo], height [24,26,32], or trigonometry incorporating the balloon radius [ 1 1,151 as the principal variable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%