Percutaneous Mechanical Assist Devices

Mulukutla, Suresh; Schneider, Lawrence W.; Cohen, Howard A.

doi:10.1002/9781444314427.ch11

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 60 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Initial enthusiasm about the device the device quickly waned due to the complexity of its insertion and higher incidence of complications. Randomized studies comparing TandemHeart with IABP in 2005 and 2006 found not only superior hemodynamics with TandemHeart, i.e., higher CPO and lower PCWP, but also more complications [ 6 , 33 ]. After the success of Impella devices, TandemHeart is scarcely used now.…”

Section: Tandemheart Systemmentioning

confidence: 99%

Role of acute mechanical circulatory support devices in cardiogenic shock

Garg

Hussain

Sareyyüpoğlu

2023

Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cardiogenic shock is a state of low cardiac output that is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. A considerable proportion of patients with cardiogenic shock respond poorly to medical management and require acute mechanical circulatory support (AMCS) devices to improve tissue perfusion as well as to support the heart. In the last two decades, many new AMCS devices have been introduced to support the right, left, and both ventricles. All these devices vary in terms of the support they provide to the body and heart, mechanism of functioning, method of insertion, and adverse events. In this review, we compare and contrast the available percutaneous and surgically placed AMCS devices used in cardiogenic shock and discuss the associated clinical and hemodynamic data to make a conscious decision about choosing a device.

show abstract

Section: Tandemheart Systemmentioning

confidence: 99%

Role of acute mechanical circulatory support devices in cardiogenic shock

Garg

Hussain

Sareyyüpoğlu

2023

Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support: A Review of the Options, Indications, and Outcomes

Gilotra

Stevens

2014

Clin Med Insights Cardiol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cardiogenic shock remains a challenging disease entity and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) can be implemented in an acute setting to stabilize acutely ill patients with cardiomyopathy in a variety of clinical situations. Currently, several options exist for temporary MCS. We review the indications, contraindications, clinical applications, and evidences for a variety of temporary circulatory support options, including the intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), CentriMag blood pump, and percutaneous ventricular assist devices (pVADs), specifically the TandemHeart and Impella.

show abstract

Percutaneous Mechanical Assist Devices

Cited by 2 publications

References 60 publications

Role of acute mechanical circulatory support devices in cardiogenic shock

Role of acute mechanical circulatory support devices in cardiogenic shock

Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support: A Review of the Options, Indications, and Outcomes

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About